London24NEWS

Post Office investigator feared difficult Horizon consultants would not ‘go properly’

A former Post Office investigator has mentioned she was afraid to problem consultants behind the flawed IT system as “if you started to challenge too much, it didn’t go well.”

Suzanne Winter, who labored on legal probes in Northern Ireland from 2001 to 2014, mentioned she was not taught to search for errors and her coaching faculty advised her the Horizon programme “was 100% reliable”.

Ms Winter advised the Post Office inquiry that workers have been below strain to recuperate money from postmasters accused of false accounting and theft. Investigators have been ranked from one to 5 based mostly on how a lot cash they have been capable of claw again, she mentioned.

Ms Winter was concerned within the probe into subpostmaster Alan McLaughlin, who was wrongfully convicted of false accounting in 2005 after £10,000 went lacking from his Belfast department. His conviction was overturned in 2022. Ms Winter additionally labored on the case of Maureen McKelvey, from Omagh, who reported £30,000 shortfalls at her department. Despite ultimately being discovered not responsible, the stress of her five-year anticipate the acquittal brought on her thyroid to rupture – leading to main surgical procedure.

Ms Winter advised the probe: “You were not told how to get any information from Fujitsu (the firm that developed the Horizon programme), because we were told that the system was 100% reliable.” Asked when she was advised that, she mentioned: “Whenever you were at the training college.”

She admitted discovering statements submitted by Fujitsu workers to assist her investigations “hard to follow” and mentioned she did not have entry to anybody within the Japanese agency. “I had to put my request through casework if I wanted anything from Fujitsu, and as far as I am aware, casework then dealt with that,” she mentioned.

“About nine years in, our casework team then got a Fujitsu liaison person, and that is the person that we would deal with then if we wanted anything from Fujitsu.” Counsel to the inquiry Emma Price requested why she did not search clarification.

Post Office Scandal

  • What is Horizon?

The Horizon IT system is accounting software program, owned by Japanese firm Fujitsu, which noticed accounts automated after subpostmasters entered their gross sales figures through a touchscreen.

  • What issues have been being brought on by Horizon?

Subpostmasters began experiencing unexplained shortfalls of their accounts and have been answerable for losses below their contract with the Post Office.

  • What did the Post Office do when subpostmasters suffered shortfalls of their accounts

The Post Office ordered subpostmasters to pay again the cash that was misplaced and have been advised they might face prosecution if they didn’t comply.

  • What occurred to subpostmasters who skilled shortfalls however couldn’t pay the cash again?

More than 700 subpostmasters have been handed legal convictions for allegations akin to theft and false accounting – with many despatched to jail or bankrupted.

  • What occurred to subpostmasters who skilled shortfalls however couldn’t pay the cash again?

In December 2019, a High Court choose dominated that Horizon contained quite a few “bugs, errors and defects” and there was a “material risk” that shortfalls in Post Office department accounts have been brought on by the system.

  • How many subpostmasters have had their convictions overturned because the 2019 judgment

A complete of 93 subpostmasters have had their convictions overturned thus far however lots of extra haven’t but come ahead.

  • Why has the scandal come to mild once more?

The Post Office Horizon IT scandal has been put within the highlight once more following the discharge of ITV’s drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office, starring actor Toby Jones.

  • Who is Alan Bates?

Alan Bates was a subpostmaster who was accused of theft when his cash inventory counts didn’t match these of the digital accounting system.
He was contractually obliged to pay again the “losses” from his personal pocket, and, regardless of first reporting points with Horizon in 2000, he had his contract terminated in 2003 when he refused to adjust to Post Office coverage.
Mr Bates led the marketing campaign group Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance to its High Court victory in 2019.

  • Why are individuals calling for Paula Vennells to have her CBE withdrawn?

More than one million individuals have signed a petition calling for the previous Post Office boss to lose her CBE after the ITV drama was launched.
People have known as for her to be stripped of her honour after overseeing the Post Office all through the time subpostmasters have been wrongly convicted.

  • Has anybody been held criminally accountable for the miscarriage of justice?

The Metropolitan Police mentioned they’re taking a look at “potential fraud offences arising out of these prosecutions”; for instance, “monies recovered from subpostmasters as a result of prosecutions or civil actions”.
Two Fujitsu consultants, who have been witnesses within the trials, are being investigated for perjury and perverting the course of justice – however no person has been arrested because the inquiry was launched in January 2020.

  • How a lot compensation has been paid to victims of the scandal?

Around £138 million has been paid out to round 2,700 subpostmasters throughout three compensation schemes, the Post Office just lately mentioned.
Hundreds of others are nonetheless ready for compensation.

  • What occurs subsequent?

A public inquiry wanting into the failings of the Horizon system and the wrongful convictions of subpostmasters is because of end this yr.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak confirmed Justice Secretary Alex Chalk is contemplating methods of serving to to clear the names of wrongfully convicted subpostmasters.

She replied: “Because it seemed to be the technical side – they were being reported as the expert of the computer and you were more or less, in the Post Office where we were, if you challenged anything… you didn’t feel you could challenge anything.”

Asked if any particular person made that case, she mentioned: “No, I wouldn’t say any particular individuals, but you just got the impression that if you started to challenge too much, it didn’t go well.”

Ms Winter was set a goal of 65% for the restoration of cash from those that have been below investigation. The ex-investigator additionally described the efficiency rating system she and others have been judged on, saying: “We could see everybody else’s, but… I didn’t go looking to see what is everybody else doing. I was just concerned with what I had been targeted to.”