RUTH SUNDERLAND: Labour risk to pensions
- For a celebration based on pursuits of employees, Labour has been unhealthy for pensions
- Party to re-instate Lifetime Allowance, which Tories are in means of abolishing
- Threatening savers with tax on pension prudence solely makes issues worse
Oddly, for a celebration based on the pursuits of employees and backed by trades unions, Labour insurance policies have been horrible for pensions.
It goes again a great distance. Gordon Brown’s transfer to axe tax aid on dividends in pension funds again in 1997 was one of many largest acts of licensed larceny ever to be dedicated by an occupant of No.11.
It took billions of kilos out of employees’ pension pots and was a significant factor within the demise of Britain’s gold-plated ultimate wage retirement plans.
Now the celebration has stated it should re-instate the Lifetime Allowance, which the Conservatives are within the means of abolishing.
Such a transfer by Labour would lead to a super-tax on retirement pots over the restrict, presently a smidgen greater than £1m.
Dynamic duo: Labour pair Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer are set to punish pensioners
That sounds loads, however loads of reasonably well-off professionals accrue this a lot over a working life.
It does not equate to Rockefeller-style retirement: perhaps round £40,000 a 12 months. Restoring the restrict would punish individuals for having invested correctly, and incentivise them to surrender work sooner than they may want, or than is nice for society.
The Labour view, nevertheless, appears to be that pension pots are the fruits of privilege, ripe for taxation. In actuality, pensions are deferred pay, that employees have saved.
Apart from the vindictiveness, re-instating the restrict could be complicated and counter-productive.
Many of these affected would quit work to keep away from the punitive tax surcharge so it’s unlikely to be a revenue-raiser.
A futile gesture then. Worse, one which sends out precisely the improper message at a time when the nation must harness its pension energy. As my colleague Hamish McRae argued within the Mail on Sunday yesterday, politicians would do higher to attempt to put proper the harm of the previous than imposing new tax penalties.
Reversing Brown’s raid and restoring dividend credit would assist cease the rot within the City, which is at risk of shedding its standing as a world-class monetary centre.
In 1997, when Brown launched his smash and seize, pension funds and different massive UK traders owned almost half of UK shares. They now maintain simply 4 per cent: go determine.
The actual downside with pensions shouldn’t be that just a few individuals have collected a pot price greater than £1m so should be penalised. It is that so many individuals haven’t collected wherever close to sufficient. ‘Generation X’ – the middle-aged cohort born between 1964 and 1980 – are in a nasty squeeze.
Most – except they work within the public sector – have been too late to learn from ‘gold-plated’ ultimate wage pensions, which assured a retirement revenue for all times. Large numbers additionally missed out on years of auto-enrolment, which solely arrived in 2012.
These mid-lifers, the eldest of whom are approaching 60, didn’t profit to the identical extent from the housing market as their Boomer predecessors. Many are supporting youngsters at college and caring for aged family members.
Catherine Foot – director of Phoenix Insights – says as much as 18m individuals are not financially ready for later life. A disproportionate quantity of them are girls. Pension saving has been pushed down the record of priorities.
All politicians ought to be encouraging extra pensions saving, particularly in mid-life. Threatening savers with a tax on pension prudence, as Labour is doing, doesn’t assist. It solely makes issues worse by including to the danger, uncertainty and complexity that bedevil retirement financial savings.