London24NEWS

Builder who constructed residence AROUND lamppost was ‘following the drawings’

  • Dave Green, 52, raised issues concerning the lamppost earlier than building began

A builder working for a property growth firm who was pressured to construct a home round a lamppost has hit again at critics, insisting he ‘constructed it how it’s set out within the drawings’.

Dave Green, who works for Sachdev Properties Limited, observed the sunshine was set again additional than all of the others on the highway in Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, earlier than the development work began.

The 52-year-old mentioned: ‘I mentioned to the proprietor initially, we have to transfer the lamppost.’

The lamppost was proper the place the fascias have been set to go, so he constructed the home anyway and sealed it into the roof tiles.

The skilled builder mentioned: ‘Everything runs stage with the pavement on that highway, all the homes are stage, I am unable to transfer that one again. 

‘I’ve constructed it how it’s set out within the drawings, that finish home is almost completed, we have got the plasterers in and so they’re almost executed.

A builder working for a property development company who was forced to build a house around a lamppost has hit back at critics, insisting he 'built it how it is set out in the drawings'

A builder working for a property growth firm who was pressured to construct a home round a lamppost has hit again at critics, insisting he ‘constructed it how it’s set out within the drawings’

Dave Green, who works for Sachdev Properties Limited, noticed the light was set back further than all the others on the road in Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, before the construction work started

Dave Green, who works for Sachdev Properties Limited, observed the sunshine was set again additional than all of the others on the highway in Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, earlier than the development work began

The 52-year-old said: 'I said to the owner at the beginning, we need to move the lamppost.'

The 52-year-old mentioned: ‘I mentioned to the proprietor initially, we have to transfer the lamppost.’

The lamppost was right where the fascias were set to go, so he built the house anyway and sealed it into the roof tiles

The lamppost was proper the place the fascias have been set to go, so he constructed the home anyway and sealed it into the roof tiles

The experienced builder said: 'Everything runs level with the pavement on that road, all the houses are level, I can't move that one back. I've built it how it is set out in the drawings, that end house is nearly finished, we've got the plasterers in and they're nearly done'

The skilled builder mentioned: ‘Everything runs stage with the pavement on that highway, all the homes are stage, I am unable to transfer that one again. I’ve constructed it how it’s set out within the drawings, that finish home is almost completed, we have got the plasterers in and so they’re almost executed’

Planning application drawings (pictured) showed that the house was always set to be built next to the lamp but not through it

Planning utility drawings (pictured) confirmed that the home was at all times set to be constructed subsequent to the lamp however not by way of it

‘We needed to seal it and make it safe in any other case it might have been damp.’

It got here after a resident on the street, the place homes promote for between £85,000 and £150,00, mentioned: ‘It does look odd. To me, it is the council’s fault. They’ve authorized the plans realizing the lamp submit was there.’

Mr Green mentioned that in the event that they did not construct the roof across the lamppost then it might have held the job up for 3 months.

He mentioned: ‘It’ll be a case of transferring a few tiles, letting the council take away the lamppost, then we are able to patch it up and match the soffits.’

A resident in the street, where houses sell for between £85,000 and £150,00, said: 'It does look odd. To me, it's the council's fault. They've approved the plans knowing the lamp post was there.'

A resident on the street, the place homes promote for between £85,000 and £150,00, mentioned: ‘It does look odd. To me, it is the council’s fault. They’ve authorized the plans realizing the lamp submit was there.’

A spokesperson for Tameside Council said: 'We have spoken to the developer and they have agreed to remove the lamppost and replace it nearer a neighbouring boundary wall.'

A spokesperson for Tameside Council mentioned: ‘We have spoken to the developer and so they have agreed to take away the lamppost and substitute it nearer a neighbouring boundary wall.’

Mr Green said that if they didn't build the roof around the lamppost then it would have held the job up for three months

Mr Green mentioned that in the event that they did not construct the roof across the lamppost then it might have held the job up for 3 months

Mr Green said: 'It'll be a case of moving a couple of tiles, letting the council remove the lamppost, then we can patch it up and fit the soffits'

Mr Green mentioned: ‘It’ll be a case of transferring a few tiles, letting the council take away the lamppost, then we are able to patch it up and match the soffits’

Planning application drawings showed that the house was always set to be built next to the lamp

Planning utility drawings confirmed that the home was at all times set to be constructed subsequent to the lamp

But having the lamppost in the end of the row was not mentioned in any documents when planning permission was granted in February 2020

But having the lamppost in the long run of the row was not talked about in any paperwork when planning permission was granted in February 2020

In fact, the decision was made based on plans showing the structure standing next to the property, not through the roofline

In truth, the choice was made primarily based on plans exhibiting the construction standing subsequent to the property, not by way of the roofline

But a Tameside Council spokesperson mentioned: ‘We have spoken to the developer and so they have agreed to take away the lamppost and substitute it nearer a neighbouring boundary wall.’

They added: ‘The Council will do the work of transferring the lamppost on the developer’s behalf, topic to receiving fee from them.’

Planning utility drawings confirmed that the home was at all times set to be constructed subsequent to the lamp.

But having the lamppost in the long run of the row was not talked about in any paperwork when planning permission was granted in February 2020.

In truth, the choice was made primarily based on plans exhibiting the construction standing subsequent to the property, not by way of the roofline.

Tameside Council finally stepped in when it grew to become clear the two-bedroomed properties could be marketed with one road lamp forming a part of the row of 4.

Tameside Council have been approached for remark.