High Court offers inexperienced gentle to £230m Woodford compensation scheme

A High Court choose has given the inexperienced gentle to a redress scheme value as much as £230million for the a whole lot of hundreds of traders burned by the collapse of the Woodford Equity Income fund in 2019.

Judge Jonathan Richards mentioned in an announcement printed on Friday he’ll sanction the scheme on the finish of February, after 93.7 per cent of the roughly 300,000 affected traders backed it in December.

But Richards dismissed requires the court docket to pressure the Financial Conduct Authority to demand WEIF’s funding supervisor – the now defunct Woodford Investment led by founder Neil Woodford – ‘high up’ the quantity that traders obtain.

High Court Judge Jonathan Richards mentioned in an announcement printed on Friday he’ll sanction the scheme on the finish of February

‘I doubt my energy to make such an order,’ he added. ‘But even when I had that energy, I’d not train it.’

Investors shall be paid as much as 77p for every £1 they misplaced when the WEIF was closed in 2019, with their first cost due in March when between £183.5million and £200million shall be paid out.

The traders’ approval of the scheme successfully blocked class actions launched by varied regulation corporations towards the once-£10billion fund’s administrator Link, and probably these towards different linked events.

Potentially within the firing line for lawsuits, for instance, was Hargreaves Lansdown, which promoted the Woodford fund till the day dealings in its shares have been suspended.

The FCA introduced the size of the compensation bundle in April final 12 months, however many critics have argued the £230million sum is unfair to traders.

Some specialists prompt traders are entitled to nearer to £1billion in compensation.

Many additionally argued that Woodford, Link and the regulator haven’t been held sufficiently accountable for the fund’s downfall.

The FCA has mentioned it considers the scheme the ‘quickest and finest probability to acquire a greater end result’ for traders.

The WEIF prospectus explicitly instructed traders that they had statutory rights to refer complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) to acquire ‘honest compensation’ ought to issues go fallacious, and to have the legal responsibility settled by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme as much as £85,000 ought to the agency then default in cost.

Is your fund on the verge of being wound up? Here’s easy methods to salvage your funding 

But the FCA efficiently argued the redress scheme might overrule these rights.

‘The Scheme presents an appalling end result for many who have been trapped in Woodford’s flagship fund when it was suspended in June 2019,’ claims Andy Agathangelou, founding father of marketing campaign group Transparency Task Force.

‘Most will get again between 4 and eight pence within the pound of their excellent capital losses, with nothing for the returns forfeit over the previous 4 and a half years, not to mention consequential losses, a lot, a lot lower than many have been led to consider by the FCA.

‘The removing of statutory rights towards the desires of these involved means the end result of this case issues to everyone that ever has, or may ever sooner or later, use UK monetary providers.’

The collapse of WEIF

Neil Woodford was as soon as among the many UK’s most well-known and widespread inventory pickers, with billions of kilos from establishments and people flowing into his funds when he began his personal enterprise.

The collapse of the Woodford Equity Income fund occurred when a run of poor efficiency led to traders pulling money out in massive volumes, which the fund was unable to service with out promoting off belongings on a budget.

This finally led to Link’s choice to droop the fund, which by no means recovered and was pressured to shut.

The affair led to fierce criticism of Woodford, Link, platforms promoting the fund and the FCA, the latter of which has been pressured to reassess guidelines after going through scrutiny in Parliament.