London24NEWS

We cannot afford to downsize! Retired {couples} face enormous stamp responsibility hit

Simone and Jim Steele love their four-bedroom bungalow which they’ve lived in for 40 years. 

Their again backyard, a 3rd of an acre of manicured magnificence, is the discuss of the road and overlooks the picturesque Preseli Hills.

‘I never get bored of the view from our garden,’ says 69-year-old Simone, a retired land prices officer for the native council. 

‘The light sometimes changes by the hour, giving me an ever-changing perspective on the world beyond our four walls.’

But the Steeles, who dwell simply outdoors Haverfordwest in Pembrokeshire, are getting more and more pissed off. 

With 75-year-old Jim now sick, they’re eager to downsize to a smaller property with a extra manageable backyard.

Trapped: Jim and Simone Steele want to see stamp duty abolished so they can downsize from their current property just outside Haverfordwest in Pembrokeshire

Trapped: Jim and Simone Steele need to see stamp responsibility abolished to allow them to downsize from their present property simply outdoors Haverfordwest in Pembrokeshire

Yet they merely can’t afford to take action — and one of many greatest impediments is stamp responsibility.

To downsize to a property they like would land them with a hefty stamp responsibility invoice — with property brokers’ charges, solicitors’ charges and transferring prices on prime.

‘I am sure that if stamp duty was abolished,’ says Simone, ‘more people of our age would downsize, freeing up larger properties for younger generations to buy.’

She says that lots of the householders on the street they dwell on are in an analogous place — eager to maneuver to a smaller property, however unable to take action due to stamp responsibility.

Like the Steeles, a whole bunch of readers have contacted Money Mail previously seven days, backing the marketing campaign we launched to get Chancellor Jeremy Hunt to chop stamp responsibility (or, even higher, abolish it) in subsequent month’s Budget.

Nearly all imagine — like us — that its scrapping would assist release a bogged-down housing market. 

It would allow individuals to maneuver up the property ladder extra simply throughout their working and household lives — after which again down it in retirement as they downsize.

The advantages would go nicely past the housing market. It would improve job mobility, permitting individuals to maneuver from one finish of the nation to the opposite in pursuit of higher job alternatives.

It would even be an financial increase, with individuals spending cash on doing up their new properties.

Our marketing campaign has already obtained political assist.

Workload: The Steeles, who live just outside Haverfordwest in Pembrokeshire, are looking to downsize to a property with a more manageable garden than their current home (pictured)

Workload: The Steeles, who dwell simply outdoors Haverfordwest in Pembrokeshire, want to downsize to a property with a extra manageable backyard than their present dwelling (pictured)

In The Mail on Sunday three days in the past, former housing secretary Robert Jenrick referred to as on the Government to ‘cut one of the most counter-productive and anti-growth taxes’. 

He added: ‘It [stamp duty] traps people in homes they want to move from and makes the elderly reluctant to downsize, which in turn leaves younger families in smaller houses.’

Unlike different tax cuts, decrease stamp responsibility would ‘create an immediate feel-good factor’, he mentioned.

Michael Gove, Jenrick’s successor as housing secretary, can be eager on a stamp responsibility reduce. Last weekend, Gove mentioned he was continuously urgent the Chancellor to introduce measures to make housing extra inexpensive. 

As nicely as a stamp responsibility reduce, Gove desires Hunt to assist first-time patrons by way of the introduction of state-backed 99 per cent mortgages.

For dwelling movers, stamp responsibility is at present charged on a sliding scale with the primary £250,000 of a property’s buy value tax-free. 

Thereafter, the speed jumps abruptly, from 5 per cent on the worth from £250,001 to £925,000; 10 per cent from £925,001 to £1.5 million; and 12 per cent on any surplus.

So, somebody transferring to a home costing £500,000 should pay stamp responsibility of £12,500, though from April 2025 this may rise to £18,750 if the nil-rate band fell again to £125,000 because the Government mentioned it should.

Like the Steeles, Clare Lake and her associate Allan are eager to downsize. They dwell simply outdoors Falmouth in Cornwall in a five-bedroom home that they used to run as a B&B.

For dwelling movers, stamp responsibility is at present charged on a sliding scale with the primary £250,000 of a property’s buy value tax-free

But with Clare turning 69 on Friday and Allan celebrating his seventieth subsequent week, the home is now past their wants, and they’re eager to maneuver nearer to Clare’s brother and son in Southampton and Lymington, respectively.

‘Allan is not in great health,’ says Clare, ‘and the stairs are sometimes a struggle for him. Also, public transport in Cornwall is not brilliant and our Barclays bank in Falmouth has shut.’

Clare, a textile designer, says: ‘We have no wish to move into a shoe box, but even if we could find a three-bedroom bungalow, we’ve labored out that we’d be waving goodbye to round £50,000 in transferring prices, a giant chunk of which might be stamp responsibility. Surely it’s time for the Government to overtake this unfairest of taxes?’

Clare says the Government ought to do extra to encourage the aged to downsize.

She explains: ‘Maybe, once homeowners reach State pension age, the Government could reduce the stamp duty yoke for them — as it does for first-time buyers.’

Currently, first-time patrons should purchase a property as much as £425,000 in worth and pay no stamp responsibility. Above this worth, the speed is 5 per cent as much as £625,000 — properties value extra don’t qualify for the reduction.

A equally massive tax-free band, or a decrease stamp responsibility fee, for retired downsizers, says Clare, could be a gamechanger. 

‘It would change the mathematics of moving straight away,’ she says, ‘and free up the housing market.’

Barbara Bass, a 70-year-old retired pharmacist from Redbridge in Essex, believes stamp responsibility must be abolished. ‘It’s a horrible tax,’ she says. 

‘You strive to better yourself by moving up the housing ladder — and the Government rewards you by slapping a tax on you every time you move. I see no justification for it. It’s like pouring cash down a drain.’

Barbara says her son David is determined to maneuver to a bigger home in Epping, Essex. He and his spouse have two kids, aged two and three, and whereas they dwell in a three-bedroom home, it’s laborious to insulate; the backyard is tiny; and it backs on to the London underground.

But they’ve been thwarted by onerous stamp responsibility prices. Barbara says: ‘In David’s case, he’s now trapped in a home inappropriate for his household’s wants.’

Research by Coventry Building Society exhibits that many homebuyers are digging into their dwelling deposit to pay their stamp responsibility invoice. 

Jonathan Stinton, head of mortgage relations, says it provides ‘to the long list of reasons why stamp duty should be top of the Chancellor’s priorities subsequent month within the Budget.’ We agree.

[email protected]

I’m dodging £22k tax – by constructing a shed as a substitute 

By LEE BOYCE 

Home improvements: Lee Boyce

Home enhancements: Lee Boyce

Eight years in the past, my spouse Danielle and I purchased our first dwelling in Rayleigh, Essex. A small however purposeful three-bedroom semi-detached home, it has served us nicely.

However, with our household about to swell from three to 4 upon the arrival of child two in April, we set our sights on transferring.

In our crosshairs: a indifferent dwelling with 4 bedrooms and a utility room. The snag? We’re taking a look at an unaffordable price ticket of a minimum of £700,000.

The primary sticking level is that on prime of this enormous sum, we’d must fork out for stamp responsibility — an impediment that I imagine is obstructing many potential second-steppers like us. We’ve constructed up a pleasant slab of fairness, save diligently and have two respectable salaries coming in. But forking out £22,500 on a monstrous stamp responsibility invoice makes what might be a step up the ladder a large leap.

So, to dodge stamp responsibility, alongside probably greater mortgage charges, we’ve opted to remain put. To enhance, not transfer. Our new youngster will inherit bed room three, the field room, which we now use as an workplace.

At the top of the month, a shed workplace is being constructed behind the backyard on an present patio space. At 10ft x 9ft, it’s an important dimension and is available in at £11,000.

The value contains full insulation, together with an electrician wiring it up with energy, broadband and lighting. At half the price of stamp responsibility, I’d a lot quite see our outlay blossom right into a tangible asset.

■ Read the complete model tomorrow by signing as much as: thisismoney. co.uk/e-newsletter