Couple at battle over seven-figure Lotto jackpot
A pair are at battle over a £1million scratchcard jackpot after supposedly shopping for the ticket ‘collectively’ earlier than splitting up weeks later.
Michael Cartlidge, 39, says he and former girlfriend Charlotte Cox, 37, bought the Lotto card collectively at a store in Spalding, Lincolnshire.
But after breaking apart with him weeks later, Ms Cox has now been deemed the only real winner by lottery chiefs.
Mr Cartlidge admits that Ms Cox paid for and scratched the ticket. But he claims that he steered the thought to purchase one and tried to switch her money within the store to cowl the acquisition.
He says that the mother-of-one initially agreed to share the money, however after strolling out on him weeks later, claimed to be the only real winner.
A supply instructed The Sun: ‘£1million has by no means introduced such distress.’
Michael Cartlidge, 39 and former girlfriend Charlotte Cox, 37 are at battle over a £1million Lotto ticket after supposedly shopping for the ticket ‘collectively’ earlier than splitting up weeks later
Mrl Cartlidge says he Ms Cox bought the Lotto card collectively at a store in Spalding, Lincolnshire
Lottery chiefs Camelot beforehand launched an investigation — which included viewing CCTV footage from the store – and had indicated to Mr Cartlidge that the cash can be break up, he says.
But it’s understood new Lottery homeowners Allwyn have now dominated that Ms Cox is the rightful claimant.
Security engineer Mr Cartlidge, maintains he has a proper to half the money and is contemplating launching authorized motion.
‘I’m in shock. I can overtly admit that we would not have gotten that ticket with out Charlotte, however she would not have gotten it with out me both’, he instructed the publication.
‘I do know it was her checking account that paid for it, but it surely ought to go 50-50 morally’, he added.
Ms Cox hit again on the ‘garbage’ claims final night time, with a supply telling the publication her former companion had ‘no proper’ to the jackpot.
The couple had been collectively for 3 months earlier than the lotto drama began.
On the night time of the win, Mr Cartlidge had been residing at Ms Cox’s home as they determined to pop to their native Lidl to purchase duck pancakes for dinner.
He then claims they steered to go to the Nisa nextdoor to purchase a few £5 scratchcards.
According to Mr Cartlidge, his former companion had instructed her she did not have the cash to pay for it so he was getting his financial institution app as much as make the switch.
But after breaking apart with him weeks later, Ms Cox has now been deemed the only real winner by new lottery chiefs
Mr Cartlidge admits that Ms Cox paid for and scratched the ticket. But he claims that he steered the thought to purchase one and tried to switch her money within the store to cowl the acquisition
The father-of-one stated: ‘I began the switch, I held it as much as present her. You can see me doing this on the store CCTV, which Camelot has.
‘The sign was dangerous so it did not undergo on the time within the store, it was simply within the means of transferring. The little loading circle was going spherical. She purchased the 2 tickets on her card and once we obtained dwelling she scratched it.’
To their amazement one of many scratchcards landed them the £1million jackpot.
40 minutes later, Mr Cartlidge’s switch went by means of.
The couple celebrated their win with a visit to the seaside. They had a number of plans within the works comparable to shopping for a home collectively and buying a automotive.
The ticket was put in Ms Cox’s title, however stated the cash was due to enter a joint account.
But three weeks later, ‘out of the blue’, Mr Cartlidge obtained a name through considered one of her mates telling him to go away the home.
So he did – and took the successful card with him.
He instructed the publication that issues began to get ‘fishy’ and felt she was ‘as much as one thing’.
So he determined to take the scratchcard and go to remain at his mom’s home.
Upon returning dwelling, Ms Cox realised the cardboard had been taken and obtained in contact with Camelot to get assist with the scenario.
Following some mediation, through which representatives from Camelot travelled to Lincolnshire to interview the pair individually concerning the dispute, they have been capable of get the ticket again.
He says that the mother-of-one initially agreed to share the money, however after strolling out on him weeks later, claimed to be the only real winner
Ms Cox hit again on the ‘garbage’ claims final night time, with a supply telling the publication her former companion had ‘no proper’ to the jackpot
Mr Cartlidge stated that he spent Christmas Eve at Ms Cox’s home dressed up as Father Christmas, believing the pair had put the dispute behind them.
And on January 25, a Camelot official despatched a message to the previous couple saying that the authorized group have been nonetheless deciding what to do however {that a} draft was being ready concerning the sharing of the prize.
But on February 10, lower than two weeks since new proprietor Allwyn took over the operating of the National Lottery, Mr Cartlidge was despatched a letter saying he was not entitled to any cash.
He now insists he’s ‘able to combat’.
But Ms Cox holds robust that his case is ‘garbage’, with a pal of hers telling The Sun: ‘You cannot consider a phrase that man says.’
According to Allwyn’s guidelines, solely the title written on the again of the ticket can declare the prize.
It instructed The Sun: ‘The National Lottery Rules for Scratchcard Games clarify that just one individual could be the proprietor of a ticket and that solely the individual whose title and tackle is written on the again of a successful scratchcard can declare a prize. This implies that a prize can solely be paid to 1 individual and that is at all times communicated clearly to prize claimants.
‘Where a claimant agrees to share a prize with different events (for instance, gamers in a syndicate) after the prize has been paid, we at all times advocate {that a} authorized settlement is drawn up between the events.
‘If there isn’t a settlement in place, any dispute between the events must be resolved between themselves.’