Husband is convicted of killing his emaciated spouse who ‘died in filth’
- Robert Morgan, 61, was convicted of killing Dorothy Morgan who died in 2021
A husband has been discovered responsible of killing his emaciated spouse who weighed solely 4 stone and was denied water for per week after she was left to ‘die in her personal filth’ throughout lockdown.
Robert Morgan, 61, was convicted of killing 71-year-old Dorothy Morgan who caught gangrene and died from sepsis after being left lined in her personal urine and faeces.
His co-accused David Holyoak, 53, Dorothy’s son by one other man, was additionally discovered responsible of manslaughter.
On January 25, 2021, Morgan advised a Cumbria Health operator his spouse had ‘actually tried to starve herself to dying’ over a number of weeks and ‘seems like one thing from a dying camp’.
Carlisle Crown Court heard how Dorothy was present in a malnourished and dehydrated state when admitted to the West Cumberland Hospital on the identical day.
Paramedics discovered her unkempt and wearing clothes which was closely dirty. She was additionally clinically dehydrated and severely malnourished.
Upon Mrs Morgan’s arrival at hospital she was discovered to be suffering from acute kidney failure, in line with excessive dehydration, and sepsis. She died 10 days in a while February 4, 2021.
Robert Christopher Morgan (pictured) has been convicted of killing his spouse Dorothy Morgan, 71
His co-accused David Holyoak (pictured), 53, Dorothy’s son by one other man, was additionally discovered responsible of manslaughter
Further investigations revealed she was additionally affected by most cancers, though that was discovered to play no half in her dying. Her bodily situation was such that she couldn’t have withstood any therapy, the courtroom heard.
A pathologist concluded that Mrs Morgan’s dying was attributable to her severely emaciated state and uncared for contaminated stress ulcers. A paramedic had famous that some leg sores have been so deep that the pensioner’s bones might be seen.
Prosecutor Iain Simkin KC advised jurors {that a} geriatrician specialising in take care of the aged had concluded the extent of Mrs Morgan’s dehydration advised she had not been given enough fluid for seven to 10 days. During that point, her urine output would have diminished to zero.
Carlisle Crown Court beforehand heard how Dorothy’s cheeks have been left ‘sunken’ after she spent her remaining few weeks dwelling on a sofa in her household dwelling in Whitehaven, Cumbria.
Morgan had advised the jury that the pensioner was ‘terrified’ of hospitals and had ordered him to not name medical doctors for medical intervention if she required it. He additionally accepted underneath cross-examination by prosecutor Iain Simkin KC, that from early January 2021, he had ‘did not maintain her fundamental human wants.’
But he didn’t declare full accountability for her dying, on February 4, 2021, saying he ‘did not discover’ her horrible situation as issues had ‘received on high of him’.
A jury took 23 hours and 12 minutes to succeed in a responsible determination for each Morgan and Holyoak, who denied manslaughter by gross negligence. Neither confirmed emotion when the decision was learn out in courtroom.
Judge Goddard KC advised each males following the choice to organize for an ‘speedy custodial sentence’.
She mentioned: ‘You have now been convicted of manslaughter by gross negligence of Dorothy Morgan. You will respect that this can be a very critical offence certainly and it is nearly inevitable that there might be speedy custodial sentences; you should each come to phrases with that.’
Gail O’Brien, senior crown prosecutor for CPS North West, mentioned after the decision: ‘This is likely one of the worst circumstances of manslaughter by gross negligence I’ve seen.
‘It would have been clear to each males that Mrs Morgan was affected by an absence of fundamental care and medical consideration, nonetheless they did not name for help till it was too late.
Morgan advised a Cumbria Health operator his spouse had actually tried to starve herself to dying’ over a number of weeks and ‘seems like one thing from a dying camp’
Carlisle Crown Court heard how Dorothy’s cheeks have been left ‘sunken’ after she spent her remaining few weeks dwelling on a sofa in her household dwelling in Whitehaven, Cumbria [Stock image]
‘The CPS labored arduous with Cumbria Constabulary to construct a robust case guaranteeing that every one the medical and pathology proof was earlier than the courtroom. The jury agreed with the CPS that each males have been responsible of manslaughter. My ideas are very a lot with the household of Dorothy Morgan.’
Security employee Morgan beforehand advised the jury that he had met Dorothy in a pub in Whitehaven in 1997 and their relationship had developed ‘in a short time.’
After three weeks, they have been dwelling collectively at her dwelling within the city in Cumbria. He mentioned that they had shared a love of studying and had greater than 1,000 books in the home and so they solely ‘very not often’ had dangerous occasions as a pair.
But Morgan mentioned that retired Dorthy, who beforehand labored at a Kangol manufacturing unit in Frizington, Cumbria, had been ‘terrified’ of hospitals.
He mentioned: ‘She made it recognized from day one which if ever she was unwell she didn’t need any intervention by medical doctors or hospitals. She would do it her approach. When I moved in, she made that clear to me that if she ever received able when she wanted assist, she wouldn’t settle for it.
‘She had a factor about West Cumberland Hospital, she did not need to go in there if she might keep away from it.’ He additionally advised the jury that she had stopped seeing her GP.
Morgan mentioned that his spouse had been a heavy smoker, and after her retirement she had slowed down and her alcohol consumption had gone up. And in his police interview, he advised officers that Dorthy had refused medical assist earlier than he finally made a 999 name and he or she was rushed to hospital on January 29.
She tragically died at West Cumberland Hospital one week later.
The pathologist Dr Armour mentioned she weighed 29kgs, about 4 and a half stone, when she handed away. The pathologist mentioned muscle losing was clearly seen in lots of areas of Dorothy’s physique, together with on her stomach and her face. He mentioned this was normally one of many final areas of the physique to lose muscle mass when an individual suffers emaciation – and her cheeks have been sunken.
Mr Simkin requested: ‘You’d have a look at her within the face and also you’d know there was one thing incorrect?’ Dr Armour responded with: ‘Yes.’
A jury took 23 hours and 12 minutes to succeed in a responsible determination for each Morgan and Holyoak, who denied manslaughter by gross negligence
The prosecutor then requested Dr Armour how she would characterise the extent of emaciation, and he replied: ‘Severe.’
The pathologist mentioned there have been sores on her again, her shoulder, her arms, her legs and her buttocks.
And he additionally discovered there have been areas of pores and skin loss and different areas the place tissue had develop into ‘necrotic,’ that means that it had died, the jury heard.
Some wounds have been typical of these suffered by an individual who had remained in the identical place with out shifting.
During his cross-examination, Morgan mentioned he had not smelled any proof of the state his spouse was in.
And he once more denied that he had ‘simply left his spouse to die’, and Mr Simkin’s suggestion that he had hardly something to do along with his spouse.
Mr Simkin advised Morgan: ‘You are mendacity as a result of you realize you left her there to die, you’re telling this jury no matter you may to attempt to get away with it. Is that proper?’
Morgan replied: ‘No – that is not right.’
Mr Simkin then requested Morgan about Dorthy failing to have ample meals or drink whereas she was dwelling on the sofa.
Morgan responded: ‘She had it; I do not know if she ate it or drank it. It was definitely provided’, however he accepted that the sofa was not clear.
Mr Simkin mentioned: ‘It was apparent that except you intervened, she was going to die* You left her since you couldn’t be bothered to do the rest.’
The defendant replied: ‘That is vastly not true.’