Gruesome new discovery about first English settlers in North America
The first English settlers to arrive in North America ate dogs to survive an extreme period of starvation, according to a gruesome new study.
Researchers at the University of Iowa discovered the remains of 16 indigenous dogs at an archaeological site in Jamestown, Virginia, that strongly suggest the 17th Century settlers ate at least six canines.
Their remains showed unmistakable signs that the colonists had skinned the dogs, dismembered their limbs and removed the flesh from their bones between 1609 and 1617 AD, the team said.
The settlers turned to eating dogs before, during and after the ‘Starving Time,’ a period in which when many in the community perished from disease, malnutrition and violence with the Indigenous tribes.
Archaeologists found the remains of 16 Indigenous dogs and confirmed that English settlers killed them for food in the early 17th Century. The canines were found in the Jamestown, Virginia settlement
Archaeologists excavated roughly an acre of land within the boundaries of the James Fort and also identified the settlements remains including a storehouse, kitchen, burial sites and barracks that showed the arrival of women and children.
Within the area, they recovered 181 canine bones from trash deposits in abandoned occupation spaces, in a former workshop, two wells and within a construction trench for the fort’s defense walls.
The ‘butchered dog remains … unquestionably date to Jamestown’s Starving Time during the winter of 1609–1610, indicating that Indigenous dogs were eaten during this period of severe famine,’ the study said.
Archaeologists expressed that the practice was not uncommon at the time.
‘Although the consumption of dog flesh in modern Western societies is considered taboo, there is a long history of eating dogs during periods of stress in England and other parts of Europe,’ they wrote.
The Starvation Period, which occurred during the winter of 1609 to 16010 killed 80 to 90 percent of the English colonists because of food shortages, contaminated water supply and a harsh winter.
Archaeologists found 181 canine bones belonging to 16 dogs, and said that at least six had been eaten by English settlers between 1609 and 1617
By the spring of 1610, only about 60 of the original colonists were still alive and George Percy – one of the original settlers – authored an account of what occurred in the wake of the starvation period.
‘Now all of us at James Town, beginning to feel that sharp prick of hunger which no man truly describe but he which has tasted the bitterness thereof.
‘… Then having fed upon horses and other beasts as long as they lasted, we were glad to make shift with vermin as dogs, cats, rats, and mice,’ Percy wrote in excerpts of his account called ‘Starving Time,’ archived by the National Humanities Center.
He added that the settlers turned to cannibalism as a means to survive and dug up ‘dead corpses out of graves and to eat them, and some have licked up the blood which has fallen from their weak fellows.’
The archaeologists reported that the dogs’ DNA was of Native American ancestry, sharing similarities with the Hopewellian, Mississippi and Late Woodland period dogs from eastern North America.
This signified the social issues that arose between the colonizers and Indigenous communities, which ‘suggest complex forces at play before, during, and after the Starving Time that influenced the presence of these dogs in the fort and led the residents of Jamestown to consume dogs with Indigenous ancestry,’ the study said.
‘Dogs with ancestry predominantly from Europe suggests that either British, Powhatan, or both groups kept their dogs from interacting with each other to maintain specific behaviors or observable phenotypes important to that group,’ lead researcher Ariane E. Thomas told SciTechDaily.
The high proportion of Indigenous dogs found at the Jamestown site ‘suggests a more complex engagement between the British and Powhatan peoples at Jamestown,’ she added.
‘Identifying Indigenous dogs at Jamestown suggests this second, more complex dynamic is more representative of history.’