Amanda Knox breaks down as she returns to Italy to clear her title
- This story is breaking, more to follow
Amanda Knox returned to an Italian courtroom in tears on Wednesday for the first time in more than twelve-and-a-half years to clear herself ‘once and for all’ of a slander charge that stuck even after she was exonerated in the brutal 2007 murder of her British roommate in the idyllic hilltop town of Perugia.
The slaying of 21-year-old Meredith Kercher fueled global headlines as suspicion fell on Knox, then a 20-year-old exchange student from Seattle, and her new Italian boyfriend of just a week, Raffaele Sollecito.
She was seen weeping as she walked into the courtroom in Florence, in Tuscany.
Flip-flop verdicts over nearly eight years of legal proceedings polarized trial watchers on both sides of the Atlantic as the case was heatedly argued on social media, still in its infancy.
Despite Knox’s exoneration and the conviction of an Ivorian man whose footprints and DNA were found at the scene, doubts about her role persist years later, particularly in Italy.
This is largely due to the accusation she made against a Congolese bar owner who employed her part time, a claim that led to her being found guilty of slander.
Amanda Knox (pictured) returned to an Italian courtroom Wednesday for the first time in more than twelve-and-a-half years to clear her name
She has returned to Italy to clear her name over slander charge that she was found guilty of after making claims against a Congolese bar owner
Amanda Knox (pictured) was tragically murdered in 2007
Knox, now a 36-year-old mother of two small children, returned to Italy for only the second time since she was freed in October 2011, after four years in jail, by a Perugia appeals court that overturned the initial guilty verdict in the murder case against both Knox and Sollecito.
She remained in the United States through two more flip-flop verdicts before Italy’s highest court definitively exonerated the pair of the murder in March 2015, stating flatly that they had not committed the crime.
‘I will walk into the very same courtroom where I was reconvicted of a crime I didn´t commit, this time to defend myself yet again,’ Knox wrote on social media.
She added: ‘I hope to clear my name once and for all of the false charges against me. Wish me luck.’
Knox’s day in court was set by a European court ruling that Italy violated her human rights during a long night of questioning days after Kercher’s murder, deprived of both a lawyer and a competent translator.
In the fall, Italy’s highest Cassation Court threw out the slander conviction that had withstood five trials, ordering a new trial, thanks to a 2022 Italian judicial reform allowing cases that have reached a definitive verdict to be reopened if human rights violations are found.
This time, the court has been ordered to disregard two damaging statements typed by police and signed by Knox at 1:45pm and 5:45pm as she was held for questioning overnight into the early hours of November 6, 2007.
Despite Knox’s exoneration and the conviction of an Ivorian man whose footprints and DNA were found at the scene, doubts about her role persist
From left, Italian student Raffaele Sollecito, slain British woman Meredith Kercher and her American roommate Amanda Knox
Raffaele Sollecito listens to his father Francesco Sollecito, right, during a press conference in Rome, Tuesday, July 1, 2014.
In the statements, Knox said she remembered hearing Kercher scream, and pointed to Patrick Lumumba, the owner of a bar where she worked, for the killing.
Hours later, still in custody at about 1 pm, she asked for pen and paper and wrote her own statement in English, questioning the version that she had signed.
‘In regards to this ‘confession’ that I made last night, I want to make clear that I´m very doubtful of the verity of my statements because they were made under the pressure of stress, shock and extreme exhaustion,’ she wrote.
Whatever the outcome, Knox risks no more jail time. The four years she served before the first acquittal covers the three-year slander sentence.
More to follow.