Nigel Farage and Ed Balls conflict brutally on GMB over Reform plans

Nigel Farage clashed brutally with Ed Balls today over whether the wealthy would benefit most from Reform’s £90billion tax cutting splurge.

Mr Farage was attacked by the presenter – and Labour ex-Cabinet minister – during an interview on ITV‘s Good Morning Britain.

Balls repeatedly demanded to know who would gain the most from raising the starting point for paying income tax to £20,000, and the inheritance tax threshold to £2million.

Mr Farage argued that the poor would be the biggest winners from the personal allowance hike ‘in percentage terms’. But Balls hit back that the wealthiest would get far more in cash terms.

He also swiped that the IHT increase would only help people who had properties worth between £1million and £2million – as they could already avoid the levy up to that level.

Nigel Farage was attacked by presenter – and Labour ex-Cabinet minister – Ed Balls during an interview on ITV’s Good Morning Britain

At one point a clearly frustrated Mr Farage griped ‘this is so typical’ about the grilling from Mr Balls, accusing him of ‘playing silly games’

At one point a clearly frustrated Mr Farage griped ‘this is so typical’ about the grilling from Mr Balls, accusing him of ‘playing silly games’.

But co-host Susanna Reid stepped in to say: ‘What do you mean this is so typical, being asked questions and asked to answer them?’

Mr Farage said: ‘We are getting stuck here on one very narrow point.’ 

He insisted that by raising the income tax threshold ‘we make work pay, we get people off benefits, we help the lower-paid keep more money in their pockets and we reduce the need for unskilled migration’.

Mr Farage was trying to defend his manifesto after the Institute for Fiscal Studies said it was based on ‘extremely optimist assumptions’ about growth and the sums ‘do not add up’. 

Mr Farage also claimed Reform has been ‘stitched up’ by a firm it contracted to vet candidates.

The party has been hit by a series of revelations about the online activities of some of its would-be MPs, from links to a British fascist leader to suggestions the UK should have remained neutral in the fight against the Nazis and admiration of Hitler’s ‘brilliant’ ability to inspire action.

Mr Farage said Reform had paid a ‘large sum of money’ to the vetting firm, which he did not name, but claimed the party had been let down.

He told LBC Radio: ‘Have we had trouble with one or two candidates? Yes, we have.

‘We paid a large sum of money to a well-known vetting company, and they didn’t do the work.

‘We have been stitched up politically, and that’s given us problems. And I accept that and I’m sorry for that.’

He dismissed as ‘utter nonsense’ questions about candidate Jack Aaron, who is standing against Defence Secretary Grant Shapps in Welwyn Hatfield, over comments about Hitler’s personality traits.

Mr Aaron said in a social media post in 2022 that Hitler ‘was basically incoherent in his writing and rationale’ but was ‘brilliant’ at using specific personality traits ‘to inspire people into action’.

Mr Farage launched Reform’s so-called ‘contract’ with voters yesterday – but critics said the policies were ‘fantasy’ and costings did not add up 

Asked about the suggestion that Mr Aaron thought Hitler was ‘brilliant’, Mr Farage said: ‘This is utter nonsense. It’s rather like… if you asked me, you know, was Hitler a good public speaker? And I say yes – suddenly I’m a supporter.

‘This is nonsense.’

Mr Aaron told The Times: ‘Yes, Hitler was as brilliant as he was utter evil. How is that controversial to say, given that he was able to turn the Germans to such destructive acts, including killing many members of my own family?

‘I strongly believe, as a psychologist, in separating intelligence and talent from morality, so that we can adequately diagnose problems and help people.’

Last week Mr Farage suggested the earlier-than-expected timing of the General Election meant vetting had not been possible.

‘Don’t forget, I’ve come in right at the last minute, we have not had time to do full vetting of candidates. It’s been impossible for us,’ he said.