Alec Baldwin left devastated as footage is performed out in courtroom

Alec Baldwin was left looking in agony after dramatic footage was played out during the second day of his manslaughter trial, showing the aftermath of the fatal shooting on the set of his ill-fated Western film ‘Rust’.

In court, jurors were shown body cam footage captured by officer Santa Fe County Sheriff’s deputy Nicholas LeFleur who was called as the first witness in the case.

The baggy-eyed actor, 66, at one point appeared to struggle to watch the footage and put his hand on his forehead.

Baldwin was a producer and the star of Rust when he shot dead cinematographer Halyna Hutchins , 42, a mother-of-one, while filming with a prop gun that had a live round inside it. The film’s director Joel Souza was also injured.

Camera footage shows Hutchins laying on her back inside the set following the shooting, with tubes coming out of her body as medical teams tend to her.

LeFleur can be heard saying: ‘One female shot in the chest, male shot in the stomach’ and calling for an air evacuation.

Director Joel Souza can be heard shouting out in pain and is seen thrashing his legs around in the clip.

LeFleur was first on the scene, with his body cam capturing him arriving on the set, getting out his car and retrieving a bag from his truck before running into the church

One person says of Souza: ‘He’s good he’s got a (inaudible) shoulder blade’, apparently referring to a bullet. Hutchins’ face appears pale but appears to move her arm to behind her head.

A woman helping Hutchins to breathe says: ‘Halyna deep breath, deep breath there you go. Deep breath Halyna. Jesus’.

Several crew members and paramedics could be seen lifting Hutchins up on a stretcher. One person had a mask over her mouth and was pumping it to help her breathe.

As the clip played out, his wife Hilaria and brother Stephen watched intently from the public gallery.

The stakes for Baldwin are incredibly high and were starkly illustrated in February when Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, 26, the armorer on the set, went on trial and was found guilty for the same charges in the same court.

In her opening statement, Erlinda Johnson, a special prosecutor appointed to the case, said that Baldwin had ‘violated the cardinal rules of firearm safety’ and that he was ‘reckless’ on set.

Johnson said that Baldwin had requested the biggest gun available after he arrived on the set in in October 2021.

She told jurors: ‘When someone plays make believe with a real gun in a real life workplace and while playing with the gun violates the cardinal rules of gun safety people’s lives are endangered and somebody could be killed.

‘That’s what this case is about. It’s simple, straightforward. That someone who played make believe with a real gun and violated the cardinal rules of firearm safety is the defendant, Alexander Baldwin.’

Johnson said that the armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed was a ‘very young woman’ and ‘inexperienced’.

She told the court that Baldwin didn’t do a safety check with Gutierrez-Reed because he ‘didn’t want to offend her’.

Johnson also criticized Baldwin’s claim that he didn’t pull the trigger saying that a firearms analyst ruled that Baldwin must have pulled the trigger.

The analyst with the FBI only got the gun to fire without pulling the trigger by breaking it during an ‘accidental discharge test’, the court heard.

While defense lawyer Alex Spiro told jurors that the death of Hutchins had been an ‘unspeakable tragedy’ but that Baldwin committed no crime.

In his opening statement, Spiro said: ‘There were people responsible for ensuring the safety of the firearm. Those people failed in their duties.

‘On this set there was a real bullet something that should never be on a movie set. You will hear no evidence that Baldwin had anything to do with that real bullet being bought on that set.

‘The actor’s job is to act, he’s Harlan Rust, he’s an outlaw running for his life. In this incident he’s pulling a six shooter.

‘His mind is in the being of another, a century away, an outlaw. He must be able to take that weapon and use it in ways that would be lethal in the real world but not on a movie set.’

Spiro told the court that investigators in the case saw Baldwin as being a ‘shiny object’ they could go for.

He said: ‘Instead of trying to find the source of the lethal bullet they focused on Mr Baldwin.

‘But Mr Baldwin was like any other actor…safety proceeds before the actor. A properly cleared gun cannot hurt anyone’.

Baldwin was said to be in a state of ‘shocking grief’ following the incident, according to Spiro who described him as being a ‘father, an artist, worried about his family’.

Spiro then criticized the law enforcement in the case saying that they didn’t have a case against Baldwin and blasted them for destroying the gun.

He said: ‘This gun had a hair trigger. The owner’s manual of this gun says if you load it with a live round and you drop it, this type of gun can accidentally go off.

‘The destruction of the gun is symbolic of this case. They weren’t really investigating any more, they were trying to disprove Alec, to get Alec, to have this day [in court]’.

Outside the court on Wednesday morning, attorney Gloria Allred held a photo of Hutchins, her mother Olga and Hutchins’ son.

Allred is representing Hutchins’ family in Ukraine as part of a civil negligence lawsuit they have brought against Baldwin in the US.

According to Allred, the family had been unable to come because of the ongoing conflict in the country, saying: ‘We would like the truth, we would like justice.’

She added: ‘Baldwin, though his attorneys have attacked us unfairly, suggested they didn’t have a close relationship with Halyna which is false.

‘I know Alec brought one of his seven children, he’s apparently signed up for a reality show. This is not a reality show!

‘This is a trial of involuntary manslaughter of a young, talented cinematographer. She had a right to be safe on that set as did every member of the crew.

‘I don’t know whether Alec Baldwin decided to make holding his baby or his wife holding the baby and then handing her to a nanny or a producer [part of] the reality show.

‘It is cynical and potentially a calculated public relations move to make him seem more sympathetic to the jury’.

Holding up the photo, Allred said: ‘This is a child as well. This is Halyna’s child who no longer has a mother.

‘Let’s not forget, this is a real case in Santa Fe, New Mexico and it has to be taken seriously!’

When asked what she thought him maybe maybe filming his reality show from jail, she added: ‘I don’t know what his plans are except if he uses this trial and his children as part of a reality show, I think it’s sick.

The trial is the culmination of a nightmare for Mr Baldwin that has lasted for nearly three years and has finally come to court.

The Emmy award winning actor, 66, has pleaded not guilty to two counts of involuntary manslaughter.

The case has had a long and tortured path to trial: Baldwin was originally charged in January 2023 with two counts of involuntary manslaughter.

They were dropped three months later in light of new evidence, prosecutors said, adding they needed more time to investigate.

Baldwin was sensationally charged for a second time in January this year with the same charges.

Baldwin and his wife are currently filming a reality TV series about their family. It is not clear if a camera crew is trailing them in New Mexico, but the show is due to air in 2025 meaning filming is likely underway now.

The case is expected to hear eight days of evidence and argument, followed by deliberations.