London24NEWS

Starmer says mountaineering NICs for companies in Budget WON’T break manifesto

Keir Starmer has insisted that hiking national insurance for employers in the Budget would not break the Labour manifesto.

In a heavy hint at the pain to come in the fiscal package, the PM said the election document was ‘very clear’ that the promise in the levy only applied to ‘working people’. 

The defiant stance comes despite growing alarm from business at the ‘tax on jobs’, and the respected Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank warning it would be a ‘straightforward breach’ of Sir Keir’s pledges. 

Sir Keir told the BBC: ‘We were very clear in the manifesto that we wouldn’t be increasing tax on working people and we expressly said that that was income tax, that was NICs etc.’

Keir Starmer has insisted that hiking national insurance for employers in the Budget would not break the Labour manifesto

Keir Starmer has insisted that hiking national insurance for employers in the Budget would not break the Labour manifesto

The comments echo Rachel Reeves' position in an interview at the government's global investment summit yesterday

The comments echo Rachel Reeves’ position in an interview at the government’s global investment summit yesterday

The head of the IFS, Paul Johnson, said the Labour manifesto was 'clear' on NICs

The head of the IFS, Paul Johnson, said the Labour manifesto was ‘clear’ on NICs

NICs is charged at different rates for employers, employees and the self-employed

NICs is charged at different rates for employers, employees and the self-employed

An Office for Budget Responsibility chart showing how national insurance revenues are already set to climb

An Office for Budget Responsibility chart showing how national insurance revenues are already set to climb 

He added: ‘It wasn’t just the manifesto, we said it repeatedly in the campaign and we intend to keep the promises that we made in our manifesto.

‘So I’m not going to reveal to you the details of the Budget, you know that that’s not possible at this stage.

‘What I will say is where we made promises in our manifesto, we will be keeping those promises.’

The comments echo Rachel Reeves’ position in an interview at the government’s global investment summit yesterday. 

Amid warnings that she needs to raise up to £30billion on October 30 to balance the books, the Chancellor claimed increasing NICs for employers was not ruled out in the Labour election manifesto.

During the election, Labour vowed not to raise income tax, VAT or national insurance – but the party is now claiming this did not include the employer part of national insurance.

Bosses pay NI at a rate of 13.8 per cent on all employees’ earnings above £175 per week. 

Increasing it by just 1p could raise around £8billion a year. 

Starting to impose the levy on pension contributions made by employers could bring in even more, at £17billion a year.

However, business sources blasted the idea. One industry figure said: ‘The main question for firms would be whether to freeze pay or cut jobs.’

Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Laura Trott said: ‘In 2021, the Chancellor said increasing employer national insurance was a tax on ‘workers’. That’s why even in her own words it breaks Labour’s manifesto promise not to increase tax on working people.

‘Rachel Reeves herself previously called the move anti-business and we agree, it is a tax on work that will deter investment, employment and growth, and the OBR says it will lower wages. 

‘Only a day after their first investment summit, the Prime Minister and Chancellor are choosing to sow further uncertainty and chaos for businesses by opening the door to a new Jobs Tax.’

Shadow chancellor Jeremy Hunt said: ‘It’s obvious to most people that raising National Insurance would breach Labour’s manifesto pledge to… not raise National Insurance!

‘Rachel Reeves herself previously called it anti-business, and we agree – it is a tax on work that will deter investment, employment and growth, and the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) says it will lower wages.’