Army instructors slept with trainee, 17, they groomed and dubbed ‘bare maid’
Lance Sergeant Antony Pugh, 36, and Sergeant Connor Forgan, 32, texted each other about the trainee in a ‘disgraceful, indecent, and misogynistic’ way, said Judge Jane England
Two Army instructor pals were today jailed for sleeping with a 17-year-old recruit and texting each other about her in a “disgraceful, indecent, and misogynistic” way. Lance Sergeant Antony Pugh and Sergeant Connor Forgan “targeted” the teenage trainee at an Army training centre and both breached their position of trust by sleeping with her, a court martial heard.
LSgt Pugh, 36, showered her with gifts from a lingerie and sex toy website and “bondage equipment” while Sgt Forgan, 32, tried to “persuade” her to send him explicit photos of herself and then have sex with him. A court martial heard the young recruit, who can’t be named for legal reasons, felt like she “couldn’t say no”.
A military judge today condemned the behaviour from the instructors and said it amounted to “grooming”. After their encounters with the trainee, LSgt Pugh and Sgt Forgan – who are friends – shared “degrading and demeaning” messages about her.
Previously it was heard they called her their “naked maid” and a “little hotty”. Both soldiers were found guilty of having sex with a child in breach of a position of trust following a trial at Bulford Military Court, Wilts.
It is forbidden for trainers and trainees in the British Army to have sexual relations. Today, LSgt Pugh was jailed for 20 months and Sgt Forgan was jailed for 16 months.
They were both based at Catterick, in Yorkshire, at the time. LSgt Pugh is a member of the Grenadier Guards, the most senior infantry regiment in the British Army and has been serving in the army for the last 17 years.
Sgt Forgan is a member of the Welsh Guards, the most senior infantry regiment in Wales, and has been serving in the army for the last 13 years. Commander Edward Hannah, prosecuting, said the victim was a “vulnerable child”, who was “upset and lonely” at the time.
Cdr Hannah said the victim had been messaging LSgt Pugh over WhatsApp and had arranged a time to meet him. She then told him that she did not want to meet him at that location because she was ‘tired’ but he went to her accommodation block anyway to have sex with her.
She told her mum that she had sex with LSgt Pugh and that she had taken an STD test, and her mum had advised that she also take a pregnancy test. The victim did not give a personal statement to the court because she said she “just wished to move on”.
Cdr Hannah said that the actions of both LSgt Pugh and Sgt Forgan amounted to “grooming”. He said: “In relation to LSgt Pugh, the gifts, you may take a view that this amounted to manipulation.
“She was reluctant to have sex with him, and she felt she couldn’t say no. In relation to Sgt Forgan, you may take a view that the sexual messages were solicited from the victim.
“In the WhatsApp messages, he describes obtaining images of the victim. The messages present evidence of persuasion. Sgt Forgan was persuading a reluctant victim.
“There was a deliberate attempt from Sgt Forgan to persuade the victim to have sex with him.”
Cdr Hannah said that in a message sent from Sgt Forgan to LSgt Pugh he said: “She’s starting to pussy out, bro. She’s flipping I think. I hope she comes round.”
Cdr Hannah said that the messages between Sgt Forgan and the victim were not recovered from his phone, and evidence of the messages were only given from the victim’s testimony in the trial.
Rachel Beckett, mitigating for LSgt Pugh, said that there was not a “significant degree” of planning orchestrated by him. She said that he had ‘positive references’ and had an eight-year relationship with two dependent children.
Ms Beckett said he had not had any criminal convictions since 2002, which was for criminal damage, and he had four unrelated service disciplinary offences.
Beverley Cripps, mitigating for Sgt Forgan, claimed that the victim could not be seen as vulnerable. She said he had been a very “talented” soldier with a “very promising future”.
Ms Cripps said his behaviour did not constitute grooming because there was no evidence the victim felt “uncomfortable”. She said he had two dependent children.
Ms Cripps said he had no previous criminal convictions and had two unrelated service disciplinary offences. Assistant Judge Advocate General Jane England said that LSgt Pugh had committed a “significant” amount of planning by sending a picture of a made-up bed to the victim.
When she did not turn up to the agreed location, he decided to go to her accommodation block with “lube and condoms”.
Judge England said: “The offence was carried out in her block because you decided that her not turning up was not enough to deter you. In her bedroom, which was a place of safety and sanctity.”
She also said that his actions constituted grooming and the messaging to her had been “grooming behaviour”. But she said he did not solicit photos from the victim because it had been a two way exchange.
Judge England said the circumstances were different for Sgt Forgan because the victim had not wanted to say anything negative about him but that the seriousness of the offence was still high.
She said: “In time, it might be that [redacted] sees what you did is on an even footing with LSgt Pugh.”
Judge England said: “You both refer to [redacted] in a disgraceful, indecent, and misogynistic manner. She was a 17-year-old girl and she was not deserving of this. She said she wants to move on, and we hope that she can.”
Judge England said that neither of the instructors had taken responsibility for their actions and continued to ‘deny’ having sex with the victim. She said this was an important case in the recruitment to the army because she said that women are still in the minority.
She said: “A female recruit choosing to go into a combat role and being targeted by her instructors in phase two training will have a chilling effect on other female recruits.”
LSgt Pugh was sentenced to 20 months imprisonment and Sgt Forgan 16 months imprisonment.
Both of them were dismissed from the army and placed on the sexual offender register.
For the latest breaking news and stories from across the globe from the Daily Star, sign up for our newsletters.
