Husband of mum accused of canine intercourse ‘could have damaged the legislation’ over filming her with pup
The husband of Malia Nummerdor, a Florida mum accused of having sex with their pet dog, could be in hot water over claims he ‘threatened’ her with the videos caught on home video
A Florida husband who allegedly caught his wife having sex with the family dog may be in hot water himself for potentially “breaking the law”. Malia Nummerdor is currently at war with her estranged husband Erik, who handed the footage over to police.
Malia claims Erik secretly filmed her without her knowledge, and then “threatened her” with the release of the incriminating video for years. However, Erik claims everyone in the house knew about the home footage security set-up and he came across the alleged sex act videos when he tried to find out who was stealing from the coin jar.
Upon discovering the alleged sick videos, he proceeded to hand over any evidence to police.
Police reportedly contacted Erik upon seeing a post on Facebook about the alleged crimes in 2024.
Erik is alleged to have uploaded a video of Malia allegedly engaging in disturbing acts with the family dog, Ranger.
If Erik tried to use the tape against Malia like she claims, this could make matters much worse for him.
Florida law “prohibits knowingly filming, distributing, or possessing qualifying pornographic material depicting prohibited sexual activity involving an animal,” Spencer Kuvin, chief legal officer and board-certified civil trial attorney at GOLDLAW in Florida, told RadarOnline. “Any one of those acts can support a third-degree felony charge,” he said.
Kuvin added that Malia could potentially pursue extortion charges against her ex, especially if “the threats were intended to obtain money, an advantage, or compel her to do something or refrain from doing something against her will”.
In Florida, making malicious threats to injure someone’s reputation, expose a secret, bring disgrace, or accuse someone of a crime are all illegal.
In a report taken by the officer who arrested Malia, it was said: “[Malia] stated the recordings were made in 2024, and that Erik had previously threatened her with the videos.”
Kuvin said it doesn’t matter that Malia knew about the cameras in the house. He said: “Knowing about a bedroom camera does not automatically establish consent to public dissemination,” adding that her “most direct statutory claim would likely be sexual cyberharassment”.
That could reportedly lead to penalties of $10,000 or more. Malia has not yet filed any complaints against her ex and it is not known if she will.
For the latest breaking news and stories from across the globe from the Daily Star, sign up for our newsletters.




