Chris Packham believes individuals ought to cease scouring house for a brand new planet to inhabit and as an alternative use the money to save lots of life on Earth.
The Springwatch host, 62, stated preserving Earth’s atmosphere was extra vital than house exploration. But he admitted he was “really torn” as a result of he has been fascinated with house journey since he was a child.
Chris, who particularly loves watching rockets blast-off, stated: “The scientist in me loves all of that. “Some of the rockets that now go up and are available again and land once more, that’s Thunderbirds from the Sixties. That was TV sci-fi for teenagers.
READ MORE: ‘Unprecedented’ cosmic ray despatched from ‘invisible hall’ in deep house detected on Earth
To learn extra tales on Chris Packham from the Daily Star, click on right here
(Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto)
“Obviously, I’m all for exploration, I at all times have been.
“But at this time limit, the big prices of these tasks weigh closely on my conscience.
“I do assume if these individuals have been extra philanthropic when it got here to taking care of the atmosphere, we’d be in a a lot better place.
“I don’t assume we’ve obtained time to assume that we’ll really escape our Earth’s orbit and have the ability to discover wherever else safe.
(Image: Adam Gerrard / Daily Mirror)
“Therefore I think we should be investing maximally and preserving the one planet that we have got.”
Last yr, £82billion was spent by governments on house exploration – with £50billion by the US alone.
But Chris stated Earth was the “only planet in the known universe where we’ve got any proof there’s complex life or any life at all”.
For the most recent breaking information and tales from throughout the globe from the Daily Star, join our publication by clicking right here.