F1 tycoon’s ex handed jail time period for failure at hand over £15m chalet

  • Caroline de Vechere was discovered to be in contempt of courtroom on the High Court 

The ex-wife of a F1 tycoon has been handed a three-month jail sentence for failing to provide him a £15million luxurious chalet within the French Alps earlier than the ski season.

Caroline de Vechere, 53, was discovered to be in contempt of courtroom by a High Court decide after breaching an order telling her to switch possession of the chalet to her ex-husband Eric Hersman, 62.

Lawyers for the rich American financier had informed the courtroom he wished his French ex ‘out’ of the property earlier than the approaching ski season and accused her of ‘misappropriating’ £1.5million in lease from the chalet.

They added that de Vechere had gone to ‘immense lengths’ to frustrate Mr Hersman and had ‘repeatedly’ failed at hand over management of the property to him. 

Mr Justice Moor, who heard that the pair have been married for greater than 20 years and had lived in South Kensington, London, imposed the sentence at a listening to within the Family Division of the High Court after Mr Hersman launched contempt proceedings.

Caroline de Vechere (pictured), 53, has been discovered to be in contempt of courtroom because of failing to switch possession of the chalet

Lawyers for her ex-husband Eric Hersman (pictured) mentioned he didn’t need his ex-wife to go to jail however wished to adjust to the order transferring possession of the chalet to him

De Vechere was not on the listening to – staged in public on the Royal Courts of Justice complicated in London – and was not represented by a barrister. 

The decide, who heard that de Vechere was considered in France, made an order which implies she may very well be arrested and imprisoned if she travels to England or Wales.

He mentioned she may apply to ‘purge’ her contempt.

Lawyers representing Mr Hersman mentioned he didn’t wish to de Vechere go to jail – however to adjust to the order to switch possession of the chalet.

The decide heard that Chalet Pearl, in Courchevel, may very well be value within the area of £15 million.

Barrister Tim Amos KC, who led Mr Hersman’s authorized workforce, informed Mr Justice Moor how one other decide had made an order, in 2019, after overseeing a dispute over cash between de Vechere and Mr Hersman at High Court hearings in London.

Mr Justice Moor heard that Mr Hersman had been ordered to pay de Vechere a lump sum of about £700,000, and de Vechere had been ordered to switch possession of the ski chalet.

He was informed that the pair had additionally collectively owned a villa in Saint-Tropez on the French Riviera.

‘The case issues the sedulous, repeated failure of the respondent ex-wife to switch to the applicant husband a premier luxurious ski chalet in Courchevel, often known as Chalet Pearl,’ Mr Amos informed Mr Justice Moor.

‘(De Vechere) has gone to immense lengths to frustrate (Mr Hersman’s) place.’

Ms de Vechere was informed at hand over Chalet Pearl, in Courchevel, to her ex-husband however has not executed so but

Mr Amos informed Mr Justice Moor that there had been a ‘misappropriation’ by de Vechere of greater than £1.5 million in lease between October 2021 and February 2023.

He mentioned there was an ‘urgency’ to ‘get (de Vechere) out’ earlier than the approaching ski season and informed Mr Justice Moor that Mr Hersman had ‘profitable purchasers lined as much as lease Chalet Pearl’.

Mr Justice Moor mentioned he was ‘glad past affordable doubt’ that de Vechere had breached an order and was in contempt.

He mentioned de Vechere had ‘no proper’ to lease out the chalet.

The decide mentioned ‘contempt of the High Court’ was a ‘very critical matter’ and added: ‘This contempt is so critical that a right away sentence of imprisonment is the one sentence that I can move.’

He informed the listening to that de Vechere would serve half of the three-month sentence earlier than being eligible for launch on licence – and mentioned, if arrested, she would return to courtroom for an additional listening to.

Lawyers informed him that the pair had additionally been concerned in litigation in France.