Shipbuilders had been at present urged to return clear about what number of British employees and the way a lot UK equipment shall be utilized in a fleet of naval assist vessels.
A “Team Resolute” bid led by Spanish firm Navantia gained the £1.6billion contract for 3 Fleet Solid Support ships final November – beating a consortium of UK-based corporations in a transfer critics branded a “betrayal”. Much of the work shall be carried out in Cadiz, with some work at Harland and Wolff’s Belfast web site, the place the Titanic was constructed.
Now, the Confederation of Shipbuilding and Engineering Unions has demanded to see plans outlining how UK employees and companies will profit from the deal. The CSEU’s maritime chairman Matthew Roberts, a GMB union nationwide officer, has written to Harland & Wolff, ship designers BMT and Madrid-based Navantia calling for solutions. He requested for copies of the “UK Content Plan for Fleet Solid Support” and “your Social Value and Training Plan”.
In the letter, seen solely by the Mirror, he says: “As you will appreciate, our members have been told that these documents set out the Team Resolute commitments to investment in the UK workforce and domestic supply chains, and – on that basis – sight of the plans is essential if confidence is to be built in the project across the wider workforce.
“We believe it is crucial that these plans are visible, understood and trusted by all stakeholders, including the workforce we represent. Engagement with the workforce and representatives will be vital to delivering a successful programme.”
The trio of 709ft, 40,000-tonne Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels will resupply Royal Navy plane carriers, frigates and destroyers with meals, ammunition and explosives. When it introduced the contract in November 2022, the Government claimed 1,200 jobs shall be created within the UK. But a minimum of 40% of the worth of the work – price about £640million – will go abroad, with a number of the constructing going down in Cadiz.
Hundreds of jobs in Spain are anticipated to be created or safeguarded – posts which unions consider may have come to Britain if a rival bid from Team UK, together with BAE Systems and Babcock, had gained.
Mr Roberts instructed the Mirror: “Team Resolute must now publish their UK Content Plan and Social Value and Training Plan so they can be held to account on them. Firstly, UK workers need to see that the level of UK work on FSS is significant, as we have always been promised it would be when we learnt the work would not exclusively be within the UK. Secondly, we need to ensure there is no backsliding of work from the UK to foreign yards; work that is allocated and promised to UK yards such as Belfast and Appledore must be completed in these yards.
“It is not good enough for Team Resolute or indeed the Tories at Westminster to tell us they have a social value plan for FSS but we can’t see it – the UK shipbuilding workforce must be able to have trust in it.”
Harland & Wolff, BMT and Navantia had been contacted individually for remark. Team Resolute issued a press release saying: “The £1.6bn FSS programme contributes significant social and economic value to the UK. More than 1,200 manufacturing jobs will be involved, with a further 800 further jobs expected to be sustained across the UK supply chain; 120 high-skilled jobs will be supported by designer BMT across its Bristol, Bath, Weymouth, Fareham, Glasgow, and Southampton sites.
“The FSS is based on an entirely British crafted design from BMT and is also the basis for a significant recapitalisation plan which is already underway at Harland & Wolff in Belfast. The Social Value Plan is commercially sensitive and therefore, would not be appropriate to release.”