Monk jailed for abusing boys in his care calls victims ‘unhinged’

  • Michael Murphy is serving his seven-year sentence at HMP Edinburgh 

A 90-year-old monk who was jailed three separate instances for abusing boys in hsi care who subjected them to electrical shocks utilizing generator has referred to as his victims ‘unhinged’ at an inquiry.

Michael Murphy appeared by video hyperlink on the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry on Wednesday from HMP Edinburgh, the place he serving a sentence for bodily and sexually abusing youngsters whereas he was a social employee with the De La Salle Brothers in Gartmore, Stirlingshire and St Joseph’s in Tranent, East Lothian, between 1961 and 1991.

Murphy continued to disclaim he was chargeable for abusing boys in his care whereas he was working on the institution, and described those that had introduced allegations, leading to convictions in 2003, 2016 and 2021, as ‘characters’ who have been motivated to complain for ‘monetary achieve’. The most up-to-date conviction noticed him being jailed for seven years.  

The former monk grew to become a member of the De La Salle brothers in 1956 and was posted to St Ninian’s School in Gartmore in 1961.

During Wednesday’s proof, the inquiry heard Murphy had been convicted of 54 expenses of bodily and sexual abuse, together with incidents the place he would hit boys on the underside with an implement manufactured from three 16in shoe laces in the event that they have been misbehaving, and that he administered electrical shocks to boys utilizing a small generator he referred to as ‘the tickler’.

Michael Murphy (pictured right here in 2003) appeared by video hyperlink on the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry on Wednesday from HMP Edinburgh , the place he serving a sentence for bodily and sexually abusing youngsters whereas he was a social employee with the De La Salle Brothers in Gartmore, Stirlingshire and St Joseph’s in Tranent, East Lothian, between 1961 and 1991

The inquiry additionally heard about an incident the place Murphy assaulted a boy so badly, he broke his arm and needed to be taken to hospital.

Murphy downplayed the incident and tried to position blame on the kid, saying the teen had ‘abused’ him due to his ‘footwear’ and described it as a ‘misunderstanding’.

He stated: ‘I had a misunderstanding with a boy about my footwear and my dangerous foot. I gave him an arm twist. I twisted his arm. That’s all.’

Lead counsel to the inquiry Colin MacAulay KC put it to Murphy that the kid sustained a damaged arm as a consequence. Murphy stated: ‘He fractured a wee bone on his arm.’

He was later requested about administering electrical shocks to youngsters, with one incident inflicting burns to a boy’s hand. Murphy continued to insist he was not administering shocks and stated the feeling went alongside the muscle of the arms and that the complainer was ‘telling lies’.

Mr MacAulay requested Murphy if he had ever administered a shock by means of the testicles. Murphy denied he had and stated his convictions have been ‘false’.

He stated he had been entrusted with the care of round 90 youngsters on his personal, with little or no coaching in find out how to take care of them.

When requested to elucidate why so many individuals got here ahead concerning Murphy’s remedy of the kids, he stated there had been ‘collusion’. Mr MacAulay requested Murphy: ‘Why are they selecting on you?’

Murphy responded: ‘I’ve already stated it’s as a result of I’m the one one alive right now. It is all about compensation.’

Meanwhile, the inquiry additionally heard from a instructor at St Joseph’s between 1978 and 1994, recognized merely as William, who was accused of hitting boys with blackboard dusters and making them sniff ammonia as types of self-discipline.

William advised the inquiry he used blackboard dusters to deal with ‘classroom nonsense’ and stated the boys would usually throw the dusters again at him. He insisted he didn’t use bodily punishment and witnessed it on the faculty solely as soon as when a boy had taken off the handbrake on a minibus.

When requested about boys being made to scent ammonia, he stated he had been speaking about ‘smelling salts’ and advised the boys he may allow them to scent ammonia.

He stated the accusations of abuse in the direction of the boys have been ‘upsetting’ as a result of he believed he had ‘at all times bought on nicely’ with them and had spent a lot of his profession working with youngsters who had social, behavioural and emotional difficulties.

William has not been convicted of any offences associated to the allegations.

In 2017, the De La Salle Brothers used the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry to apologise to victims who had suffered abuse inside their care.

The spokesman for the De La Salle Brothers, David Anderson, stated nothing may very well be stated to defend the mistreatment of youngsters.

‘Where a brother at any of those faculties was chargeable for the mistreatment of a kid or younger grownup entrusted to the congregation’s care, the congregation provides an unreserved apology,’ he stated on the time.

The inquiry, earlier than Lady Smith, continues.