Winter gasoline cost axe is PASSED by the Commons regardless of Labour revolt

Scrapping the winter fuel payment was approved by the Commons today despite Keir Starmer suffering a revolt.

MPs signed off the controversial measure by 348 to 228 to this afternoon. It appears around 50 Labour members abstained from the division – which technically was on a Tory motion to annul the plan.

Just one MP, Jon Trickett, voted with the opposition, but the Government’s majority still fell to 120 from its theoretical strength of 167. The leadership had threatened to suspend the whip from rebels, and seven are already out in the cold following a previous protest over the two-child benefit cap.

The result – which drew shouts of ‘shame’ in the chamber – came after a bruising debate, with warnings that panicking old people are planning to ride buses all day and go to bed at 5pm to stay warm.

Earlier, pensions minister Emma Reynolds risked stoking the row by insisting there are ‘plenty of very wealthy pensioners’ who do not need the handouts – which can be up to £300. 

Kicking off the debate in the Commons, shadow work and pensions secretary Mel Stride said Sir Keir’s promises of ‘integrity’ had ‘gone out the window’ and urged Labour MPs to ‘look to your conscience’.

‘Broken promises already, that special contract that they sought to have with the British people based on integrity and decency smashed into a million pieces,’ he said.

In a statement posted on X, Mr Trickett said: ‘This winter will be extremely difficult for my constituents of all ages. After years of obscene profiteering by energy companies, they are hiking bills once again.

‘I fear that removing the payment from pensioners will mean that many more will fall into poverty this winter. We know that the consequences of pensioner poverty are devastating. It can even be a matter of life and death. I have worked behind the scenes to try and change the Government’s position, but to no avail.

‘Our country is richer than it’s ever been, but the wealth is not shared fairly. In my view the Government should be looking to raise revenues from the wealthiest in society, not working class pensioners.

‘I could not in good conscience vote to make my constituents poorer. I will sleep well tonight know that I voted to defend my constituents.’

Tories lined up to condemn the decision to strip the benefit from 10million pensioners. 

Former minister Esther McVey claimed that Labour has ‘declared war on pensioners’.

She told the Commons: ‘The public knows this decision to rob millions of pensioners of their winter fuel allowance – for which the Government has no mandate – has nothing to do with economics, and everything to do with cynical political calculations, and the haste with which it is being done is breathtaking.’

During a Westminster Hall debate before the main business in the Commons, Labour MP Rachael Maskell said: ‘A constituent has had leukaemia, they need to keep warm and have their heating on but cannot afford to, it costs £300 a month. 

‘A recently widowed constituent at the depth of their personal sadness now scared they will not survive the winter, they can’t afford their heating.

‘Another goes to bed at five o’clock to keep warm. One told me he wears jumpers, a coat and a warm hat but the air is still cold and damp. 

‘And Rose, registered as severely visually impaired who lives alone, said ‘I’m a council tenant with no extra assets’. She went on to tell me she was scared, abandoned was her words – the winter fuel payment was her lifeline.’

Ms Maskell said the Government ‘must have the capacity to find another way’, adding: ‘They put their hope in Labour because, like me, we believe that we exist to fight for working people, to protect the poor and seek justice, equality and fairness.’

Ms Maskell said the economic imperative of the measures has been ‘shredded’ before encouraging delays to implementing the policy, saying: ‘My constituents plead I do something, my goodness I am trying but the minister must too.

‘Please, let us mitigate, let’s give people the confidence that we have, the comfort and care they need, help and protection to keep safe, warm and well this winter. If it can’t be done then delay these regulations.’

But Ms Reynolds responded that the cut was the ‘right decision given the tough choices that we face’.

‘Just to be very, very clear, I have spoken to a number of (MPs) present about the Government’s decision and there actually is fairly widespread agreement that this benefit should not be universal,’ she said.

‘There are plenty of very wealthy pensioners who are getting transfers of £200, or £300 if they’re over 80, into their bank account and who don’t need it, so it’s right that we target this support on the poorest pensioners.’

Many of the rebels are expected to abstain rather than vote against the cut – after Sir Keir ruthlessly suspended the whip from a group who voted to abolish the two-child benefit cap. 

Ministers have been pointing to an expected £460 rise in the state pension next year in a bid to defuse the row. 

Official figures typically used to set the increase in April showed earnings going up by 4 per cent.

Sir Keir and Chancellor Rachel Reeves have been highlighting the prospect of a hike to offset the loss of up to £300 from the winter fuel allowance.

Ms Reeves last night told panicking Labour MPs she would not back down – and suggested pensioners could afford to tighten their belts this winter.

The Chancellor said she did not ‘relish’ the cut, but warned there would be ‘more difficult decisions to come’ in next month’s Budget.

Ministers have refused to publish an assessment of the likely impact of the cut, which will save £1.5billion a year.

The ‘triple lock’ means the state pension rises by the highest out of earnings, inflation or 2.5 per cent. For April the earnings figure will almost certainly be the top figure. 

A 4 per cent increase would mean the full state pension for men born after 1951 and women born after 1953 hitting £11,962.50 next year.

That comes after a £900 increase last year.

The final decision will be made by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall ahead of the Budget next month, but Ms Reeves has been emphasising her commitment to the mechanism. 

Earlier, a Cabinet minister squirmed as he refused to guarantee pensioners will not die of cold due to the winter fuel payment cut.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was put on the spot as he toured broadcast studios ahead of a crunch vote on the plans this afternoon.

The government is facing a revolt by dozens of Labour MPs amid mounting fury about the policy.

Asked on Sky News to promise that no pensioners will die of cold as a result of the Government’s move, Mr Reynolds said: ‘No-one should die of cold in this country.’

Pressed again for a guarantee, Mr Reynolds said: ‘I can guarantee we’re doing everything we can to make sure that not only the state pension is higher and everyone is better off but that support is targeted where it needs to be.’

Mr Reynolds then scrambled to clarify his position when asked the same question in a later interview, saying: ‘No. We are making sure that we can reassure people by saying the state pension is higher than last winter and energy bills are lower than last winter.’ 

Mr Reynolds was also forced to deny jibes from unions that Chancellor Rachel Reeves was behaving like the ‘Grinch’. 

It came as Tory shadow work and pensions secretary Mel Stride accused the PM of making the cut ‘to find the billions that has already been transferred to line the pockets of (his) union paymasters’.

There are signs that the row has been hitting Sir Keir’s popularity, with research by More in Common suggesting his net approval has fallen to minus 20.  

Mr Reynolds was confronted with remarks made by RMT general secretary Mick Lynch at the TUC conference yesterday, where he said that Ms Reeves would be likened to the Grinch.

‘I don’t think that that is fair in any way,’ the minister told LBC.

‘What we have been able to do is first of all be serious about decisions that the previous government has sat on… it’s nothing like the kind of austerity that we saw under George Osborne.

‘It is a recognition that where the previous government has made commitments that it can’t honour, you’ve got to be responsible within there.’

A new assessment by the Resolution Foundation think-tank yesterday warned that 1.3million of the poorest pensioners would be driven deeper into poverty by the move. 

Former Labour frontbencher Richard Burgon said the plan ‘will result in the death of pensioners who won’t be able to turn the heating on’.

Tory work and pensions spokesman Mel Stride urged Labour to listen to their constituents.

Throwing down the gauntlet to Labour MPs, he said: ‘Do as you said you would and put the country before your party. Vote with us in Parliament, not against us. 

‘Change course and reverse your cruel choice to remove the winter fuel payment from millions of vulnerable pensioners.

‘Many driven into fuel poverty this winter will have to choose between heating and eating because of Starmer. And, if Labour MPs let this abhorrent policy go through, it will be because of them too.’

Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, cautioned the rise in the state pension will only partially offset the pain for the millions of pensioners who are being stripped of their winter fuel allowance.