Rachel Reeves ‘plans to hike employers’ National Insurance by as much as two proportion factors in Budget to lift £20bn for public providers’

Rachel Reeves is set to increase employers’ national insurance contributions by up to two percentage points to collect billions to help fund the NHS.

Ahead of the upcoming budget on October 30, the Treasury is said to have already decided on upping the levy which could raise around £20billion. 

Alongside this, the Chancellor is expected to lower the threshold for when employers start paying the tax. 

Employers in the UK currently pay national insurance of 13.8 percent on a worker’s earnings above £175 a week.

The changes to employers’ national insurance contributions are set to be the single largest revenue raiser of next week’s Budget. 

A government source said according to The Times: ‘There is a universal consensus that the NHS needs more money. That means asking businesses to help out. 

Rachel Reeves is set to increase employers’ national insurance by up to two percentage points to collect billions to help fund the NHS

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a TV interview at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa on October 24

‘The choice is investment versus decline. She [Reeves] is choosing not to ask working people to pay the price for their [the Conservatives’] failures.’

However, business leaders have warned that the tax rises could lead to lower wages as employers try to cover their costs. 

Currently a company with ten employees earning £35,000 each would pay £35,742-a year in employer national insurance. 

However, if the rate was to increase by two per cent, this total would jump to £40,922 per year.

Speculation has been growing over the policies Labour will introduce in its first Budget in almost 15 years to fill a ‘£22billion hole’ in public finances. 

In his manifesto, Sir Keir Starmer promised not increase taxes for ‘working people’ but has since been under pressure to define what he meant by the term. 

In an interview with Sky News at the Commonwealth summit in Samoa, Sir Keir said a working person is somebody who ‘goes out and earns their living, usually paid in a sort of monthly cheque’ but they did not have the ability to ‘write a cheque to get out of difficulties’.

He and Ms Reeves were previously warned that increasing employers’ national insurance contributions would be a ‘straight forward breach’ of this pledge. 

She is likely to argue, however, that it is not a breach as it will not directly affect employees. 

Keir Starmer (pictured in Apia, Samoa) insisted next week’s fiscal package would ‘rebuild’ services and the economy

Ms Reeves also considered introducing national insurance employer pension contributions but is understood to have scrapped the idea. 

Although this tax would raise an estimated £10billion, there are concerns it would leave people poorer in their retirement. 

As well as increasing employee national insurance contributions, the government is also looking at upping levies on asset sales, such as shares and property. 

There may also be changes to inheritance tax. 

However, Sir Keir has insisted there is ‘no reason’ for entrepreneurs to leave the country.

He said: ‘My evidence that what we are saying is attractive to investors is last Monday’s investment summit that was hugely successful.

‘All the feedback back to us has been that it was very well received by a significant number of global investors.’

Sir Keir insisted people were investing in Britain ‘because of what this government is bringing to the table’.

Downing Street later said investors ‘shouldn’t be worried about this Budget’, despite some rushing to sell assets due to expected hikes in capital gains tax.

What the PM said on ‘working people’ and tax 

In an interview with Sky News in Samoa, Keir Starmer was pushed on his manifesto pledge to protect ‘working people’ from tax rises and how he defined them. 

‘For working people we made an absolute commitment that their income tax wouldn’t go up, their NI wouldn’t go up, their VAT wouldn’t go up. 

‘I said that in the campaign, we’re going to keep to those promises. We are going to have to make difficult decisions in this budget, I’m not going to preempt the budget you know that. 

‘But what we are going to do, it’s really important that we fix the foundations, that we clear up this mess once and for all and on that we build a better Britain. 

‘That will be measured in people feeling better off, in the NHS not just back on its feet but fit for the future and public services working in the way that people can expect to see from their public services.

‘I would define a working person who goes out and earns their living, usually in a monthly cheque, but that’s obviously very broad so let me be clear. 

‘What I mean, who I have in my mind’s eye when I’m making the decisions as Prime Minister are the sorts of working people who go out, work hard and maybe save a bit of money but don’t have the wherewithal to write a cheque to get out of difficulties if they or their family get into difficulties. 

‘People who have got that anxiety if you like in the bottom of their stomach that says, we’re doing it all right, but if something were to happen to me or my family I don’t have the wherewithal to get out of it.

‘When I tell you who’s in my mind’s eye, I think everyone watching will know whether they are in that category because you carry in that situation a sort of knot in the bottom of the stomach which if push comes to shove and something happens to me and my family I can’t just get a cheque book out, even if I have savings.

‘They are the sort of people I came into politics for to try and make sure tehy had secure jobs, and didn’t have the anxiety of public services not working, to make them feel like they have better opportuniteis… that’s who I had in my mind’s eye.’

‘Pressed on whether that covered people who work but also get money from assets such as property and shares, Sir Keir said: ‘They wouldn’t meet my definition, but you can probably give me any number of examples, you’re adding a second questions to the first which is you’re asking me for a definition of a working person and then making assumptions about what kind of taxes could go up. 

‘You could go through that exercise or you could ensure working people hear from me… people watching this will know whether they are in that group or not, people who work hard, who are anxious to make ends meet, and who know that if something happens to them or their family, they can’t just write a cheque book. 

‘I am really concerned about them, politics for me is who do you have in your mind’s eye when you make those decisions, I’m not ideological.

‘I made clear promises in the election campaign and I intend to keep those promises, so let me be very clear about that.’