Do you agree with Rachel Reeves’ iron fist method?

What do you think about Rachel Reeves’ ‘iron fist’ approach to spending taxpayers’ money?

She’s kicking off a huge overhaul of how every penny is spent, vowing to root out waste with a firm hand.

She’ll be launching a major spending review today which will take a look at how each pound of taxpayer money is used. All the Cabinet ministers are going to be told that their budgets need to be in line with the Prime Minister’s big plan for change, which includes stricter targets on issues such as crime, the NHS, and schools. The Treasury’s going to be sending out letters to let ministers know that if their spending doesn’t align with these priorities, they’ll have to stop.

Part of the review will involve Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Darren Jones, shadowing doctors, nurses, and police officers to see firsthand how money is spent across the UK. He’s not just interested in what money goes where, but also how public services can be revamped for more efficient use of cash. There’s even an online portal where businesses can pitch in with ideas on how to improve public services. On top of that, budgets will get a serious inspection by a panel of experts, including former senior managers from places like Lloyd’s, Barclays, and the Co-op.

Ms. Reeves doesn’t mince words either. She’s been pretty vocal about the previous Tory government’s spending habits, calling out millions wasted on poor-value projects. She’s clear on her stance: “We will not tolerate it. I said I would have an iron grip on public finances, and that means taking an iron fist against waste.”

Her goal is to modernise public services, save money, and ultimately provide better services for people all across the country. She’s determined that every pound of government spending will be scrutinised to make sure it’s going where it’s needed, putting an end to any waste.

So, do you think this approach will work? Would you back Reeves’ tough stance on government spending?