War Plans Leak Reveals The Shocking Incompetence Of The Trump Administration

New details in the case of top U.S. officials messaging each other about war plans — and accidentally including a journalist in the conversation — reveal the breathtaking incompetence of President Donald Trump’s administration just two months into his new term.

The Atlantic on Wednesday published the full message chain from a Signal group chat that the magazine’s editor-in-chief was inadvertently invited to join earlier this month. The messages, which The Atlantic first reported on Monday, discussed plans for strikes in Yemen, along with other sensitive national security matters.

The conversation gives a glimpse into how lax some of the nation’s top officials were while discussing those matters.

“We are currently clean on [operational security],” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth texted the group, which included several officials and a number that wasn’t known to him: The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg.

Here are some of the biggest takeaways from this national security failure:

The Trump administration’s decision to use a third-party messaging app like Signal flies in the face of basic operational security measures.

Even before Monday’s bombshell report, a Pentagon-wide email reportedly went out last week explicitly warning against using Signal for communications.

“A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal messenger application,” the email began.

The email added that Russian hacking groups were targeting “Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest.” But in this case, Russian hackers had nothing to do with the leaks: The Trump administration did that all on its own.

After Goldberg published his initial story saying Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Waltz, accidentally added him to the Signal group, Trump’s team pushed back on the claim that they ever discussed war plans.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Tuesday that “No ‘war plans’ were discussed” and that “No classified material was sent to the thread.”

And on Wednesday, after The Atlantic published messages in which officials discussed the strike on Yemen, Hegseth defended himself on social media.

“So, let’s me get this straight,” Hegseth wrote on X. “The Atlantic released the so-called ‘war plans’ and those ‘plans’ include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information.”

“Those are some really shitty war plans,” Hegseth added.

But the former Fox News anchor and current defense secretary had sent some of the most revelatory messages of all in the group chat titled “Houthis PC small group,” including a detailed timeline of the attack plans. More from Hegseth’s texts:

1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)

1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)”

1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)

1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)

1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.

MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)

We are currently clean on OPSEC

Godspeed to our Warriors.

As The Atlantic pointed out in its story on Wednesday, it could have been catastrophic for U.S. troops if those messages had gotten into the wrong hands.

Just 31 minutes after Hegseth wrote to the group, U.S. warplanes launched to carry out their attack. More from The Atlantic:

If this text had been received by someone hostile to American interests—or someone merely indiscreet, and with access to social media—the Houthis would have had time to prepare for what was meant to be a surprise attack on their strongholds. The consequences for American pilots could have been catastrophic.

As more information has come to light, the Trump administration has remained remarkably consistent on one point: It wasn’t their fault.

While testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday, CIA Director John Ratcliffe claimed that using Signal was a policy of President Joe Biden’s administration.

“That is a practice that preceded the current administration to the Biden administration,” Ratcliffe said.

But former Biden officials stressed Signal was never allowed on their government phones.

“We were not allowed to have any messaging apps on our work phones,” one former top national security official told HuffPost on the condition of anonymity. “And under no circumstances were unclassified messaging apps allowed to be used for transmission of classified material. This is misdirection at its worst.”

In an interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham on Tuesday, Waltz suggested that Goldberg may have intentionally infiltrated the group.

“You’ve got somebody else’s number on someone else’s contact, so of course I didn’t see this loser in the group,” Waltz said. “It looked like someone else. Now whether he did it deliberately or it happened in some other technical means is something we’re trying to figure out.”

Waltz couldn’t seem to answer directly how Goldberg got on the text thread, leading Ingraham to say, “That’s disturbing.”

“That’s why we’ve got the best technical minds, right?” Waltz responded. “And that’s where … I’m sure everybody out there has had a contact where it said one person and then it said a different number.”

As Trump officials continue to point fingers at everyone but themselves, some Republican lawmakers have acknowledged the staggering incompetence taking place.

“Sounds like a huge screwup. I mean, is there any other way to describe it?” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told reporters on Monday. “I don’t think you should use Signal for classified information.”

And Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) may have summed it up best in his response: “Somebody fucked up.”