Keir Starmer has rejected claims his team covered up key details in documents relating to Lord Peter Mandelson’s vetting for US ambassador after Kemi Badenoch alleged information was withheld
Keir Starmer has dismissed “cover-up” claims following No10’s release of the initial batch of evidence regarding Peter Mandelson’s ambassadorial appointment . . . but admitted it was “my fault”.
The development follows Downing Street’s publication of a 147-page dossier, containing information about the vetting processes for the Labour stalwart’s prestigious Washington role. Lord Mandelson was dismissed by Mr Starmer last year due to his connections with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
No10 today addressed allegations that crucial information had been omitted from the first batch of what could be tens of thousands of documents concerning Lord Mandelson’s appointment. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch levelled the accusation after it was revealed that a comment section designated for the Prime Minister’s input remained empty.
The PM’s official spokesman informed journalists: “I refute the suggestion of a cover up. The government’s complied fully. I just don’t accept that it’s the case at all. There are a range of different ways in which the Prime Minister’s senior team responds to advice.”
He continued: “The Prime Minister did read the advice, but clearly there are lessons to be learned on the wider appointment processes, and the processes that led up to them.”, reports the Mirror.
It is understood nothing was redacted from the relevant section of the document.
Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.
Keir Starmer also admitted to reporters in Northern Ireland today that “it was me that made the mistake” in appointing Lord Peter Mandelson as US ambassador “and it’s me that makes the apology to the victims of Epstein”.
Documents released on Wednesday revealed that Lord Mandelson was offered a £75,000 severance payment after initially seeking a payout for his entire four-year contract – costing the taxpayer £547,201.
Downing Street and high-ranking ministers have suggested that the Labour veteran should return the money – or give it to charity.
For the latest breaking news and stories from across the globe from the Daily Star, sign up for our newsletter by clicking here.