Investors in Edinburgh Worldwide urged to reject new Saba assault

Shareholders are being urged to turn out in force to thwart a US hedge fund raider from seizing control of a major investor in Elon Musk’s SpaceX.

Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust (EWIT) is under siege from Saba Capital, a New York-based fund run by poker-playing financier Boaz Weinstein. He wants to turf out EWIT’s entire board and replace them with three of his own hand-picked nominees.

The investment trust, whose biggest holding is a stake in the Musk space exploration firm worth an estimated £165 million, is due to hold its annual general meeting at the end of this month, at which all of its board members will be up for re-election.

It is Weinstein’s third attempt to unseat the board after his initial bid last year and a second in January were defeated after a large chunk of EWIT’s more than 20,000 shareholders, including thousands of small investors, turned out in force to oppose his takeover plans.

But bosses warned this weekend that Saba is hoping that investor fatigue over his long-running campaign will drive down turnout at the AGM, allowing Weinstein (pictured) to finally win the vote and take control, effectively letting the hedge fund seize EWIT’s precious SpaceX holding ‘on the cheap’. They have urged small investors to make sure they vote against Saba’s board nominees and support the existing directors, with those holding shares through investment platforms being asked to vote earlier as their deadlines could be as much as a week before the meeting.

EWIT investors using the Fidelity platform will need to cast their votes by this Friday (April 24) while for customers of Hargreaves Lansdown, Interactive Investor and AJ Bell the cut-off date is on Monday (April 27). Investors can also vote at the AGM on the day if they attend.

Stop the SpaceX heist: Boaz Weinstein wants to turf out EWIT’s entire board and replace them with three of his own hand-picked nominees

EWIT chairman Jonathan Simpson-Dent told The Mail on Sunday: ‘If investors turn out in significant numbers, as they did in January, Saba can be defeated and shareholders can protect access to high-growth companies like SpaceX.’

Last week, shareholder advisory firms PIRC and ISS recommended investors reject Saba’s nominees. PIRC said it had ‘concerns’ the three candidates could undermine the board’s independence. ISS said Saba had ‘not presented a compelling case for change in control’.

Baroness Altmann, a former government pensions minister and shareholder rights’ campaigner, said: ‘Saba has cynically relied on weak shareholder protections so far but previous rounds of this battle have shown the power ordinary shareholders have to defend their own interests.’

The tussle over the trust has taken on renewed urgency after reports emerged that SpaceX is planning to list later this year, in what is likely to be one of the biggest stock market floats in history.

It is estimated that the firm could be worth as much as £1.3 trillion when it goes public, meaning EWIT’s stake could surge, generating hefty returns for investors. Richard Stone, head of industry body the Association of Investment Companies, said: ‘If shareholders don’t come out in force, Saba will be able to grab the steering wheel of Edinburgh Worldwide with its valuable SpaceX flotation around the corner.’

The trust has estimated that at least 75 per cent of its investors would need to vote for it to be in with a chance of defeating Saba, which is its largest shareholder and controls around 30 per cent of the business. This is slightly higher than the record 70 per cent turnout the trust recorded in January when Saba last attempted to take over the board.

Saba scored a victory earlier this month when it defeated proposals put forward by EWIT’s board that would have allowed shareholders to cash out before it takes control of the business.

The sector suffered a blow on Thursday when investors in Impax Environmental Markets, another UK firm targeted by Saba, approved an exit offer that would effectively dismantle the trust, despite shareholders voting to continue the business last year.

Trusts have demanded City watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority, intervene to stop minority investors such as Weinstein calling repeated votes to force their agenda on companies.

But the regulator’s head of markets Simon Walls previously said such events were part of the ‘rough and tumble’ of finance.

Investors must put this opportunistic hypocrite right back in his place 

By David Schachter, Senior Vice President, Gabelli Funds

Debunking misinformation often requires much more effort than it takes to create it in the first place. And so it seems to be with Boaz Weinstein, the squatter in the UK’s investment trust sector.

One of the many false narratives Weinstein and his firm Saba Capital have perpetuated in their smear campaign against the investment trusts is the absurd claim that he represents smaller ‘Mom-and-Pop’ investors, as we call them here in the US.

In fact, I’m not sure he has ever spoken to ‘Mom and Pop’ considering he never returns phone calls or bothers to show up at the annual meetings of the funds he has launched his campaigns against. I, on the other hand, have spoken to the real Mom-and-Pop investors during my more than 43 years working with retail investors in the US. I have dozens of notebooks filled with their names, the names of their children, and in many cases, their grandchildren. These investors are pleased with their long-term investments, which provide income and security as they grow older.

Weinstein plans to pull the rug out from under small investors like these by misrepresenting the funds he targets in a calculated manner designed to obscure his true motivations.

He also brags that he always manages to hedge his bets so he can swiftly reverse course if things go south.

But Mom-and-Pop investors don’t have the cash to do that – not unless your parents also run a multi-million dollar hedge fund like Saba. Boaz also seems to be engaging in a ‘do as I say, not as I do’ policy. Two of his listed funds, Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund I and II, both trade at double-digit discounts to the value of their assets, the very same thing for which he has lambasted trusts like Edinburgh Worldwide.

The situation was so bad I was nominated to their boards to use my skills as a ‘Discount Doctor’, as my colleagues call me, to narrow them back down.

So when Boaz attacks UK trusts over their performance he is not only an opportunist, he is also a hypocrite.

But he can be beaten if those ‘Mom and Pop’ investors turn out in large enough numbers.

Weinstein is praying that smaller shareholders will be too worn out to oppose him again at the upcoming Edinburgh Worldwide AGM on April 30.

Shareholders need to be vigilant and vote against his plans and make sure their portfolios are not hijacked to fill Saba’s self-serving war chest.

DIY INVESTING PLATFORMS

Affiliate links: If you take out a product This is Money may earn a commission. These deals are chosen by our editorial team, as we think they are worth highlighting. This does not affect our editorial independence.

Compare the best investing account for you