rn","

rnrn","

rnrn"],"adCount":0,"midArticleAdPartner":null},"isCollectionEmbed":false}\">

Patel also criticized the sheriff\u2019s department for its handling of DNA evidence and took credit for the discovery of surveillance video showing a masked individual carrying what appears to be a gun on the front steps of Nancy Guthrie\u2019s home on the night of her alleged abduction. That footage, which was released publicly Feb. 10, remains the case\u2019s most significant lead.

\u201cWe could have gotten it days before. We could have also maybe gotten more data,\u201d Patel said of the clip. As for Nanos\u2019 use of a Florida-based lab for DNA analysis, he added, \u201cWe would have analyzed it within days and maybe gotten better information or more information. Our lab\u2019s just better than any other private lab out there, and we didn\u2019t get a chance to do that.\u201d

Not long after the podcast interview was released, Nanos responded to Patel\u2019s claims in a lengthy statement shared on X, noting the FBI was \u201cpromptly notified by both our department and the Guthrie family.\u201d

\u201cWhile the FBI Director was not on scene, coordination with the Bureau began without delay,\u201d he wrote. \u201cWe remain committed to a thorough, coordinated, and fact-based investigation and will continue working closely with our federal partners as the process moves forward.\u201d

Neither Nanos nor Patel offered further leads on Nancy Guthrie\u2019s whereabouts. To date, no suspects in the case have been identified.

Patel\u2019s public clash with Nanos comes amid a flurry of discourse surrounding the FBI director\u2019s conduct. Last month, The Atlantic published an expos\u00e9 that claimed Patel is \u201cdeeply concerned that his job is in jeopardy\u201d following unexplained absences and \u201cbouts of excessive drinking,\u201d among other issues.

Patel responded to the article by filing a $250 million lawsuit against The Atlantic and journalist Sarah Fitzpatrick, alleging defamation. On Wednesday, MS NOW reported that the FBI had launched a criminal leak investigation into Fitzpatrick that The Atlantic deemed \u201ca dangerous new attack on press freedom.\u201d

", "datePublished": "2026-05-07", "dateModified": "2026-05-07", "author": { "@type": "Person", "@id": "#person-HenryGriffiths", "name": "Henry Griffiths" }, "image": "https://london24news.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/sheriff-in-nancy-guthrie-case-hits-back-at-kash-patel-blame-game.jpg", "interactionStatistic": [ { "@type": "InteractionCounter", "interactionType": "http://schema.org/CommentAction", "userInteractionCount": "0" } ], "publisher": { "@id": "#organization" }, "mainEntityOfPage": "https://london24news.co.uk/amp/2026/05/07/sheriff-in-nancy-guthrie-case-hits-back-at-kash-patel-blame-game/" }

Sheriff In Nancy Guthrie Case Hits Back At Kash Patel Blame Game

By Henry Griffiths on May 7, 2026

An Arizona sheriff who has been at the forefront of the search for NBC journalist Savannah Guthrie’s mother strongly disputed FBI Director Kash Patel’s claims of being “kept out” of the investigation.

Patel, appearing on Tuesday’s episode of the “Hang Out with Sean Hannity” podcast, accused Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos and his associates of waiting too long to engage the FBI in the Feb. 1 disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, 84.

“The first 48 hours of anyone’s disappearance are most critical,” he said. “It’s a state and local law enforcement matter. What we, the FBI, do is say, ‘Hey, we’re here to help. What do you need? What can we do?’ And for four days, we were kept out of the investigation.”

Patel also criticized the sheriff’s department for its handling of DNA evidence and took credit for the discovery of surveillance video showing a masked individual carrying what appears to be a gun on the front steps of Nancy Guthrie’s home on the night of her alleged abduction. That footage, which was released publicly Feb. 10, remains the case’s most significant lead.

“We could have gotten it days before. We could have also maybe gotten more data,” Patel said of the clip. As for Nanos’ use of a Florida-based lab for DNA analysis, he added, “We would have analyzed it within days and maybe gotten better information or more information. Our lab’s just better than any other private lab out there, and we didn’t get a chance to do that.”

Not long after the podcast interview was released, Nanos responded to Patel’s claims in a lengthy statement shared on X, noting the FBI was “promptly notified by both our department and the Guthrie family.”

“While the FBI Director was not on scene, coordination with the Bureau began without delay,” he wrote. “We remain committed to a thorough, coordinated, and fact-based investigation and will continue working closely with our federal partners as the process moves forward.”

Neither Nanos nor Patel offered further leads on Nancy Guthrie’s whereabouts. To date, no suspects in the case have been identified.

Patel’s public clash with Nanos comes amid a flurry of discourse surrounding the FBI director’s conduct. Last month, The Atlantic published an exposé that claimed Patel is “deeply concerned that his job is in jeopardy” following unexplained absences and “bouts of excessive drinking,” among other issues.

POLITICS

Sheriff In Nancy Guthrie Case Hits Back At Kash Patel Blame Game

Related Posts

Burnham’s homelessness mission cannot come quickly sufficient — Victoria’s story exhibits why

Nigel Farage ‘ought to hold his head in disgrace’ as Brexit led to small boat disaster, critics warn

Andy Burnham urged to reject profit cuts and harder sanctions to repair ‘Neets’ disaster

‘Andy Burnham’s greatest take a look at can be difficult the deeper issues behind homelessness’

‘People tough sleeping in doorways and stations is not the Britain I wish to see’

Inside Andy Burnham’s mission to proceed Manchester’s homelessness success throughout the entire of England

Andy Burnham launches nationwide drive to supply all tough sleepers mattress this winter in ‘ethical mission’