Keary-Erin Carrington has admitted to a number of allegations involving a patient, including sexual contact on University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust’s premises and telling him she loved him
A nurse who “mislead her employer” and engaged in inappropriate touching with a vulnerable patient in his hospital room has been suspended. Keary-Erin Carrington also gave him her phone number and allegedly booked a hotel room to have sex with him on her day off.
Ms Carrington, who worked at University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, later lied about her contact with the patient, telling her employer the patient had contacted her on social media and she had not stayed in touch with him outside work, a tribunal heard.
She admitted a string of allegations, from giving the patient her personal phone number and adding him on social media, to engaging in sexual contact on the trust premises and telling the patient she loved him. The trust premise was not named during the hearing but it does run five hospitals, including Southampton General Hospital, and a birth centre.
The patient was moved to the trust in August 2023 and was set for a long stay. He reported he suffered “a lot with self-harm” while on the ward, making him a “particularly vulnerable patient”, a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) panel heard.
The patient, named only as Patient A, “relied on Ms Carrington for social confidence on the ward and for social interaction”.
The nurse gave him her phone number and they exchanged sexual text messages and it was “alleged that further down the line Ms Carrington booked a hotel for them both to engage in sexual intercourse on her day off,” the tribunal heard.
On November 5 in 2023, Ms Carrington filed an incident report form with the trust, stating that Patient A had initiated their contact.
The panel said it considered this “a serious attempt to mislead her employer and divert responsibility towards Patient A”.
Staff raised concerns when they believed they saw the patient receiving a text from Ms Carrington, and about the amount of time she was spending with the patient.
She was “directly questioned” by the trust multiple times and denied anything improper, the panel heard. It ruled that Ms Carrington had committed serious misconduct.
“The public would be appalled to know that a nurse had engaged in such conduct and such conduct causes serious damage to the reputation of the nursing professions,” the panel said.
“The sexual conduct, both within the clinical environment and away from the trust, was particularly serious.”
The panel added: “Sexual misconduct with a vulnerable patient, coupled with repeated dishonesty to an employer, seriously undermined the trust placed in nurses.”
In its decision, the panel imposed an interim suspension order for 18 months, suspending the nurse but giving her time to appeal against the decision.
If no appeal is made within 28 days, this will be replaced with a striking off order, meaning Ms Carrington will be removed from the register and barred from working as a nurse.