Omid Scobie says he might title the 2 ‘royal racists’ sooner or later

Omid Scobie has speculated about naming the 2 ‘royal racists’ sooner or later – as his Dutch writer sparked contemporary questions by suggesting Endgame was pulled from sale resulting from an ‘error’ versus a ‘translation’ difficulty.

Mr Scobie’s guide has precipitated chaos after the Dutch translation, Eindstrijd, appeared to disclose the title of an individual alleged to have commented on the pores and skin color of the infant Prince Harry and Meghan had been anticipating, Prince Archie.

Dutch royal journalist Rick Evers then noticed that two Royal Family members appeared to have been named because the ‘royal racists’ in his nation’s translated copy.

Mr Scobie’s Dutch writer Xander Uitgevers stated that they had been ordered by US bosses to place gross sales ‘on maintain’ on the eleventh hour. 

The royal creator issued an announcement this afternoon during which he insisted it was a ‘error within the translation’ within the Dutch model and he was ‘completely satisfied’ that it was being corrected. 

But showing on ABC’s Nightline, which aired within the US early this morning, the royal creator speculated that the 2 ‘royal racists’ might be named in future.

He advised the programme: ‘Unfortunately, those are two names that I have to keep to myself for now. But I do wonder if that might change over the future. It does seem that Harry and Meghan have decided to put that to rest.’

Speaking about letters exchanged between King Charles III and Meghan after the incident was revealed in the Oprah Winfrey interview in March 2021, Mr Scobie added: ‘We know from sources that Charles was horrified that’s how Meghan felt those conversations were and that he wanted to, sort of as a representative of the family, have that conversation with her.’

After Mr Scobie described it as an ‘error in translation’, his Netherlands publisher simply referred today to ‘an error that occurred in the Dutch edition’ – not making any reference to a translation issue, suggesting there may be a difference in opinion as to what actually happened. 

The statement read: ‘The rectified edition of Eindstrijd by Omid Scobie will be in bookstores on Friday 8 December. Xander Uitgevers temporarily removed the book from sale, due to an error that occurred in the Dutch edition.’ 

Thousands of copies of Endgame, which was published globally yesterday to withering reviews for its vindictiveness toward the Royal Family, now face being pulped as a result of the error.

Dutch royal journalist Rick Evers revealed on ITV‘s Good Morning Britain that the first name was ‘very specific’, while the second one was ‘a little bit vague’.

In the English-language edition Mr Scobie does not name the royal accused by Meghan of expressing ‘concern’ about the skin colour of her future son Archie.

But the book alleges that in her letters to discuss the situation the duchess claims similar remarks were made by a second person in the Royal Household.

In the English version, Mr Scobie says he knows the names of both individuals but ‘laws in the United Kingdom prevent me from reporting who they were’. The same sentence is in the Italian edition.

However a page taken from a review copy of the book sent to Dutch journalists this week clearly points the finger at a senior royal.

Referring to the letters discussing the issue, it reads dramatically: ‘But in those private letters an identity was revealed and confirmed: [The Mail has redacted the name concerned and will not be repeating it].’

It is unclear why one foreign language version of the book would name a specific individual when no other editions appear to do so. And it should be stressed that there is no evidence the claim itself is even true.

Mr Evers, who first revealed yesterday that the book had identified one of the ‘royal racists’, told Good Morning Britain today: ‘Names of two senior royals are mentioned during the book.’ 

Host Richard Madeley then asked: ‘Can I be clear about this, there are two names in the book?’

And Mr Evers replied: ‘Yes, the first one is very specific. The second one is a little bit vague, if this person is really involved in the story. But the first one is very clear and the official way was that it was a translation issue. There are some debates about how these passages were stated in the book. I would say how could you translate a name wrong?’

Mr Madeley then said: ‘Well, I was going to ask you, how do you mistranslate a name. You can mistranslate a word or a sentence, but a name? Do you buy that explanation from the publishers that it’s a translation error? 

Mr Evers responded: ‘I can’t believe it. I got through the book with a colleague of you and we saw some passages were missing in the English version. Like a sentence, five sentences between the first and the third part that was in the Dutch version. 

‘So something has been erased during the work that has been done for the book. So my suggestion is that… the official words from Omid were that it was “never in the production of Omid”. 

‘Which is way of saying, well if it’s a production, then it is produced – well, it’s my theory – but then a manuscript has never been produced, but it has been used of course. So I think it was in the manuscript but legal agents said it’s not a good idea to mention these names because of, well, that’s where we are.’

The Dutch version doesn’t just include the specific royal’s name but contains no mention whatsoever of Mr Scobie’s claim in the English version that he is prevented by law from repeating it.

A spokesman for the Dutch publisher, Xander, told the Mail: ‘You are right but I can’t talk about the details. We have, however, received a request to put the title on hold and that is what we have done.’

Asked when that request was received, she explained: ‘Just now. We are awaiting further instructions. I do not know how long this will be. You should speak to the US agent.’

They later claimed it was an ‘error’ and was ‘currently being rectified’.

Adding to the confusion, Mr Scobie told Dutch chat show RTL Boulevard that he did not mention a name in his manuscript.

He added: ‘The book is available in a number of languages and unfortunately I can’t speak Dutch so I haven’t seen the copy for myself, but if there have been any translation errors I am sure the publisher has got it under control.

‘For me, I edited and wrote the English version, there has never been a version that I’ve produced that has names in it.’

HarperCollins in New York, Mr Scobie’s publishers, did not respond to requests for comment. 

Two major bookshops in central Amsterdam said they had not received deliveries as expected yesterday, though offered to order a copy for delivery ‘in about a week’.

 

Nightline also spoke to ABC royal contributor Victoria Murphy, who claimed that the name would only be revealed if the person or people involved identified themselves.

She said: ‘The only way we would ever find out is if a member of the royal family directly involved chose to say so on the record. We won’t have any confirmation or that won’t gain any further traction unless that happens. ‘

Mr Scobie also told Nightline that Harry and Meghan will never move back to Britain.

He said: ‘I asked these questions to people around them. Will Meghan go back to acting? No. Will they move back to the UK? No, no never. I think they found their forever place out here. They seem happy, they’ve built a world they’re actually thriving in.’

And, commenting on rumours over a rift within their marriage, he added: ‘From everything I understand, they’re absolutely fine. This is a pair who have literally bonded over their trauma and experiences, sort of them being against the world as it’s felt to them at times. I don’t think that that bond is particularly breakable.’

But Mr Scobie also told Nightline that Prince William does not trust Harry.

He said: ‘The reality is, when you look at the details, when you speak to the people around them, any effort that Harry had made to speak with his brother has been thwarted.

‘The sources around William say that William doesn’t trust his brother. He called him a “defector” at one point. These are really strong feelings. And I don’t think that they’ve gone away or changed.’

He also told of the apparently awkward moment that Harry, Meghan, William and Kate reunited for a walkabout in Windsor after Queen Elizabeth II’s demise in September final yr.

Mr Scobie stated: ‘I used to be advised that silence within the automobile on the best way from the form of quadrangle at Windsor Castle to the Long Walk was palpable. You know, it was simply extraordinarily uncomfortable and awkward.

‘It was sad, because I think that for the public, the image was, oh, great, the fab four are back together again. The reality is, after they left that walkabout, they didn’t talk again.’

And he insisted that Harry and Meghan were not involved in the book, adding that any suggestion otherwise ‘couldn’t be further from the truth, actually’.

There was no touch upon something referring to Endgame from Buckingham Palace, which has handled the guide with a contemptuous silence.

One royal supply advised the Mail yesterday that it was ‘completely suffering from errors that discredited it as a bit of journalism’.

The furore started yesterday after Mr Evers leaked the title on social media.

That meant that whereas Mr Scobie, 42, was gleefully waving to photographers in New York and embarking on a spherical of chat present appearances to publicise his new tome, the title of the senior royal supposedly involved was being shared on social media – though most reactions to it had been disbelieving and sympathetic.

The unique declare about racism was made by Meghan in her notorious Oprah interview when she revealed there have been ‘a number of conversations’ between herself, Harry and members of the Royal Family about ‘how darkish’ their unborn child Archie can be.

‘In these months after I was pregnant [there were] issues and conversations about how darkish his pores and skin is perhaps when he was born,’ Meghan stated within the interview.

Harry added: ‘That dialog, I’m by no means going to share. It was awkward, I used to be a bit shocked.’ Meghan added: ‘I feel it will be very damaging for them.’

The ensuing furore led Prince William to state publicly that they had been ‘very a lot not a racist household’.

Harry later clarified the royal was not Queen Elizabeth II or the Duke of Edinburgh.

In his new guide Mr Scobie refers to an change of letters between Meghan and her father-in-law that had been stated to handle the duchess’s ‘issues about unconscious racial bias within the royal household’ and contained ‘damning particulars’.

Mr Scobie goes on to say that Charles first reached out to Meghan in spring 2021 to precise his unhappiness over the ‘distance’ between them and his disappointment that the couple selected to go so public with their phrases. 

Despite the clear inferences in her interview, Scobie falls over himself to emphasize that Meghan by no means used the phrases racist or racism when she spoke concerning the occasion or in her personal letters.