WW3 map reveals most secure nations to flee to if Mad Vlad actually does begin nuclear warfare
As tensions rise and fears of another world war loom, many are questioning where they might find refuge should Russia escalate from nuclear threats to actual missile launches.
Previously, it was thought that Russia would only retaliate with its nuclear arsenal if attacked by a nuclear warhead. However, in recent weeks, Mad Vlad has indicated that an attack with conventional weapons would now justify such a response.
While it’s likely that big cities London or New York would be targeted by the crazy Russian leader, there are potential sanctuaries for those who could otherwise get caught in the crossfire.
Here they are:
READ MORE: Dad of Brit POW captured by Russia says ‘he was in love with Ukrainian girl’
READ MORE: Mad Vlad Putin could ‘turn out the lights for millions’ of Brits with cyber blitz
ANTARCTICA
The icy wilderness could be one of the safest havens in the event of nuclear warfare.
Given its remote position at the Earth’s southernmost point, it’s unlikely to hold any strategic importance. Plus, with 5.4 million square miles of untouched land, there’s plenty of room for millions to seek shelter from the conflict. The only problem is it might be a tad chilly.
ICELAND
Another potential sanctuary is Iceland, nestled far up north. Known as one of the most peaceful nations globally, it has reportedly never engaged in any war or invasion.
The Icelandic government has also allegedly signed a bilateral agreement with Ukraine, although its support is limited to funding and minimal transportation. While the island should largely evade the worst impacts of a European nuclear war, fallout from extensive nuclear strikes on the mainland could potentially reach its shores in small quantities.
NEW ZEALAND
The land of the kiwis could also offer refuge for those looking to escape Putin’s nuclear war. According to the Global Peace Index, the country ranks second and has maintained a neutral stance on most conflicts.
Another appealing aspect of the country is its mountainous terrain, providing a natural defence against potential invasions. The Kiwi government has shown support for Ukraine, both financially and in actions against Russia at the International Court of Justice.
SWITZERLAND
Often associated with peace, is a logical choice for survival in the event of a nuclear war.
Having maintained neutrality since World War Two, the country’s landscape provides a sense of protection for its citizens. Alongside its geographical advantages, Switzerland also has a significant number of nuclear fallout shelters.
The country hasn’t provided aid to either Russia or Ukraine, making it less likely to be seen as a threat by Putin. Some have accused Switzerland of favouring Russia, as the Swiss government has blocked the delivery of Swiss-made weapons purchased by other European countries.
GREENLAND
The world’s largest island, owned by Denmark, is unlikely to ever be a real target for any global superpower. Besides being remote and politically neutral, the island’s current population is only 56,000 people.
INDONESIA.
Indonesia has boldly declared it will remain neutral in global conflicts, with the nation’s founding father Achmed Sukarno coining its foreign policy as “free and active.”
Officials insist on a stance of independence in international affairs, prioritising world peace above all.
TAVALU
Nestled midway between Hawaii and Australia, may be small with just 11,000 souls, but it’s mighty in its unattractiveness to aggressors due to its frail infrastructure and scant natural resources.
ARGENTINA
Despite its history of conflict including the infamous Falklands War, it could be the ultimate survivor in a post-nuclear famine scenario. With an abundance of crops and reserves to fall back on, even if nuclear fallout blocks out the sun, Argentina’s food supply might just see it through.
BHUTAN
Having pledged neutrality since joining the United Nations in 1971, is snugly landlocked and shielded by formidable mountain ranges, making it a tough nut to crack in any potential conflict.
CHILE
With its lengthy, narrow stretch along South America’s western edge, it boasts a robust geography that could serve as a strategic advantage in times of global turmoil.
It’s home to a variety of crops and natural resources that would make survival easier.
Plus, Chile’s infrastructure is considered the most advanced in all of South America.
FIJI
This island nation is reportedly 2,700 miles away from its nearest country, Australia.
Along with strategic significance and an army of 6,000 people, the nation ranks highly on the Global Peace Index. Much of the island is also made up of dense forests, minerals and fishing spots.
SOUTH AFRICA
The country has multiple sources of food, fertile land and freshwater, making survival easy.
Additionally, the country’s modern infrastructure could also increase the chances of survival as these resources are managed.